An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs
Most bacterial regulatory RNAs exert their function through base-pairing with target RNAs. Computational prediction of targets is a busy research field that offers biologists a variety of web sites and software. However, it is difficult for a non-expert to evaluate how reliable those programs are. H...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2015
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615726/ |
id |
pubmed-4615726 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
pubmed-46157262016-02-03 An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs Pain, Adrien Ott, Alban Amine, Hamza Rochat, Tatiana Bouloc, Philippe Gautheret, Daniel Review Most bacterial regulatory RNAs exert their function through base-pairing with target RNAs. Computational prediction of targets is a busy research field that offers biologists a variety of web sites and software. However, it is difficult for a non-expert to evaluate how reliable those programs are. Here, we provide a simple benchmark for bacterial sRNA target prediction based on trusted E. coli sRNA/target pairs. We use this benchmark to assess the most recent RNA target predictors as well as earlier programs for RNA-RNA hybrid prediction. Moreover, we consider how the definition of mRNA boundaries can impact overall predictions. Recent algorithms that exploit both conservation of targets and accessibility information offer improved accuracy over previous software. However, even with the best predictors, the number of true biological targets with low scores and non-targets with high scores remains puzzling. Taylor & Francis 2015-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4615726/ /pubmed/25760244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2015.1020269 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
repository_type |
Open Access Journal |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
US National Center for Biotechnology Information |
building |
NCBI PubMed |
collection |
Online Access |
language |
English |
format |
Online |
author |
Pain, Adrien Ott, Alban Amine, Hamza Rochat, Tatiana Bouloc, Philippe Gautheret, Daniel |
spellingShingle |
Pain, Adrien Ott, Alban Amine, Hamza Rochat, Tatiana Bouloc, Philippe Gautheret, Daniel An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs |
author_facet |
Pain, Adrien Ott, Alban Amine, Hamza Rochat, Tatiana Bouloc, Philippe Gautheret, Daniel |
author_sort |
Pain, Adrien |
title |
An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs |
title_short |
An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs |
title_full |
An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs |
title_fullStr |
An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs |
title_sort |
assessment of bacterial small rna target prediction programs |
description |
Most bacterial regulatory RNAs exert their function through base-pairing with target RNAs. Computational prediction of targets is a busy research field that offers biologists a variety of web sites and software. However, it is difficult for a non-expert to evaluate how reliable those programs are. Here, we provide a simple benchmark for bacterial sRNA target prediction based on trusted E. coli sRNA/target pairs. We use this benchmark to assess the most recent RNA target predictors as well as earlier programs for RNA-RNA hybrid prediction. Moreover, we consider how the definition of mRNA boundaries can impact overall predictions. Recent algorithms that exploit both conservation of targets and accessibility information offer improved accuracy over previous software. However, even with the best predictors, the number of true biological targets with low scores and non-targets with high scores remains puzzling. |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615726/ |
_version_ |
1613491159260200960 |