Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching

Cognitive control is required in situations that involve uncertainty or change, such as when resolving conflict, selecting responses and switching tasks. Recently, it has been suggested that cognitive control can be conceptualised as a mechanism which prioritises goal-relevant information to deal wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cooper, Patrick S., Garrett, Paul M., Rennie, Jaime L., Karayanidis, Frini
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2015
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480360/
id pubmed-4480360
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-44803602015-06-29 Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching Cooper, Patrick S. Garrett, Paul M. Rennie, Jaime L. Karayanidis, Frini Research Article Cognitive control is required in situations that involve uncertainty or change, such as when resolving conflict, selecting responses and switching tasks. Recently, it has been suggested that cognitive control can be conceptualised as a mechanism which prioritises goal-relevant information to deal with uncertainty. This hypothesis has been supported using a paradigm that requires conflict resolution. In this study, we examine whether cognitive control during task switching is also consistent with this notion. We used information theory to quantify the level of uncertainty in different trial types during a cued task-switching paradigm. We test the hypothesis that differences in uncertainty between task repeat and task switch trials can account for typical behavioural effects in task-switching. Increasing uncertainty was associated with less efficient performance (i.e., slower and less accurate), particularly on switch trials and trials that afford little opportunity for advance preparation. Interestingly, both mixing and switch costs were associated with a common episodic control process. These results support the notion that cognitive control may be conceptualised as an information processor that serves to resolve uncertainty in the environment. Public Library of Science 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4480360/ /pubmed/26107646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131556 Text en © 2015 Cooper et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Cooper, Patrick S.
Garrett, Paul M.
Rennie, Jaime L.
Karayanidis, Frini
spellingShingle Cooper, Patrick S.
Garrett, Paul M.
Rennie, Jaime L.
Karayanidis, Frini
Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
author_facet Cooper, Patrick S.
Garrett, Paul M.
Rennie, Jaime L.
Karayanidis, Frini
author_sort Cooper, Patrick S.
title Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_short Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_full Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_fullStr Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_full_unstemmed Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_sort task uncertainty can account for mixing and switch costs in task-switching
description Cognitive control is required in situations that involve uncertainty or change, such as when resolving conflict, selecting responses and switching tasks. Recently, it has been suggested that cognitive control can be conceptualised as a mechanism which prioritises goal-relevant information to deal with uncertainty. This hypothesis has been supported using a paradigm that requires conflict resolution. In this study, we examine whether cognitive control during task switching is also consistent with this notion. We used information theory to quantify the level of uncertainty in different trial types during a cued task-switching paradigm. We test the hypothesis that differences in uncertainty between task repeat and task switch trials can account for typical behavioural effects in task-switching. Increasing uncertainty was associated with less efficient performance (i.e., slower and less accurate), particularly on switch trials and trials that afford little opportunity for advance preparation. Interestingly, both mixing and switch costs were associated with a common episodic control process. These results support the notion that cognitive control may be conceptualised as an information processor that serves to resolve uncertainty in the environment.
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2015
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480360/
_version_ 1613240084580007936