The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research

If psychosis is a transdiagnostic dimension, the expression of which is governed by a dynamic set of contextual and emotional factors that are amenable to treatment, current approaches in psychiatric nosology and therapeutic research may need to be revised. The dominant approach to date is to clinic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: VAN OS, Jim
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing 2015
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466847/
id pubmed-4466847
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-44668472015-06-26 The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research VAN OS, Jim Commentary If psychosis is a transdiagnostic dimension, the expression of which is governed by a dynamic set of contextual and emotional factors that are amenable to treatment, current approaches in psychiatric nosology and therapeutic research may need to be revised. The dominant approach to date is to clinically and conceptually situate psychotic symptoms in the construct of schizophrenia. However, schizophrenia, which has a lifetime prevalence of 1%, only represents the poor outcome fraction of a much broader spectrum of psychotic disorders which have a lifetime prevalence of 3.5%. Therefore, research findings in schizophrenia may reflect mechanisms of prognosis rather than fundamental associations with psychosis and other symptom domains per se. Similarly, the discovery that up to 30% of individuals with non-psychotic common mental disorders have subthreshold psychotic symptoms that situate them on the transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis – and which impact clinical severity and treatment response – indicates that the rigid separation between ‘psychotic’ and ‘non-psychotic’ hampers both clinical practice and research. Diagnostic manuals in psychiatry would benefit from a system of transdiagnostic dimensions, including a transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis. Introduction of transdiagnostic dimensions allows for a system combining a nomothetic (i.e., group-specific) categorical diagnosis with an idiographic (i.e., person-specific) combination of dimensional scores. The advantage of such a system is that it encourages consideration of how symptoms dynamically interact with each other in a network of psychopathology, and of how this network is impacted by the social world. Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing 2015-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4466847/ /pubmed/26120256 http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215041 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author VAN OS, Jim
spellingShingle VAN OS, Jim
The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research
author_facet VAN OS, Jim
author_sort VAN OS, Jim
title The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research
title_short The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research
title_full The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research
title_fullStr The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research
title_full_unstemmed The transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research
title_sort transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis: implications for psychiatric nosology and research
description If psychosis is a transdiagnostic dimension, the expression of which is governed by a dynamic set of contextual and emotional factors that are amenable to treatment, current approaches in psychiatric nosology and therapeutic research may need to be revised. The dominant approach to date is to clinically and conceptually situate psychotic symptoms in the construct of schizophrenia. However, schizophrenia, which has a lifetime prevalence of 1%, only represents the poor outcome fraction of a much broader spectrum of psychotic disorders which have a lifetime prevalence of 3.5%. Therefore, research findings in schizophrenia may reflect mechanisms of prognosis rather than fundamental associations with psychosis and other symptom domains per se. Similarly, the discovery that up to 30% of individuals with non-psychotic common mental disorders have subthreshold psychotic symptoms that situate them on the transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis – and which impact clinical severity and treatment response – indicates that the rigid separation between ‘psychotic’ and ‘non-psychotic’ hampers both clinical practice and research. Diagnostic manuals in psychiatry would benefit from a system of transdiagnostic dimensions, including a transdiagnostic dimension of psychosis. Introduction of transdiagnostic dimensions allows for a system combining a nomothetic (i.e., group-specific) categorical diagnosis with an idiographic (i.e., person-specific) combination of dimensional scores. The advantage of such a system is that it encourages consideration of how symptoms dynamically interact with each other in a network of psychopathology, and of how this network is impacted by the social world.
publisher Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing
publishDate 2015
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466847/
_version_ 1613235547218640896