Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones
Main Authors: | Knoll, Thomas, Buchholz, Noor, Wendt-Nordahl, Gunnar |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2012
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442916/ |
Similar Items
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20–30 mm single renal pelvic stone
by: Hassan, Mohammed, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Does lithotripsy increase stone recurrence? A comparative study between extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy
by: El-Assmy, Ahmed, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy of Primary Intrahepatic Stones
by: Kim, Myung Hwan, et al.
Published: (1992) -
Predictive Factors of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
by: Choi, Ji Woong, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy for treating patients with bladder stones
by: Telha, Khaled A., et al.
Published: (2016)