Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region

Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified associations between common diseases and a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome. We investigate the effectiveness of several statistics, including p-values, likelihoods, genetic map distance and linkage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Spencer, Amy Victoria, Cox, Angela, Walters, Kevin
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282378/
id pubmed-4282378
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-42823782015-01-15 Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region Spencer, Amy Victoria Cox, Angela Walters, Kevin Original Articles Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified associations between common diseases and a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome. We investigate the effectiveness of several statistics, including p-values, likelihoods, genetic map distance and linkage disequilibrium between SNPs, in filtering SNPs in several disease-associated regions. We use simulated data to compare the efficacy of filters with different sample sizes and for causal SNPs with different minor allele frequencies (MAFs) and effect sizes, focusing on the small effect sizes and MAFs likely to represent the majority of unidentified causal SNPs. In our analyses, of all the methods investigated, filtering on the ranked likelihoods consistently retains the true causal SNP with the highest probability for a given false positive rate. This was the case for all the local linkage disequilibrium patterns investigated. Our results indicate that when using this method to retain only the top 5% of SNPs, even a causal SNP with an odds ratio of 1.1 and MAF of 0.08 can be retained with a probability exceeding 0.9 using an overall sample size of 50,000. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-01 2013-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4282378/ /pubmed/24205929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12043 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Annals of Human Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd/University College London (UCL). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Spencer, Amy Victoria
Cox, Angela
Walters, Kevin
spellingShingle Spencer, Amy Victoria
Cox, Angela
Walters, Kevin
Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region
author_facet Spencer, Amy Victoria
Cox, Angela
Walters, Kevin
author_sort Spencer, Amy Victoria
title Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region
title_short Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region
title_full Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region
title_fullStr Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Efficacy of SNP Filtering Methods for Identifying a Single Causal SNP in a Known Association Region
title_sort comparing the efficacy of snp filtering methods for identifying a single causal snp in a known association region
description Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified associations between common diseases and a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome. We investigate the effectiveness of several statistics, including p-values, likelihoods, genetic map distance and linkage disequilibrium between SNPs, in filtering SNPs in several disease-associated regions. We use simulated data to compare the efficacy of filters with different sample sizes and for causal SNPs with different minor allele frequencies (MAFs) and effect sizes, focusing on the small effect sizes and MAFs likely to represent the majority of unidentified causal SNPs. In our analyses, of all the methods investigated, filtering on the ranked likelihoods consistently retains the true causal SNP with the highest probability for a given false positive rate. This was the case for all the local linkage disequilibrium patterns investigated. Our results indicate that when using this method to retain only the top 5% of SNPs, even a causal SNP with an odds ratio of 1.1 and MAF of 0.08 can be retained with a probability exceeding 0.9 using an overall sample size of 50,000.
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
publishDate 2014
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282378/
_version_ 1613172707143188480