The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment

Quite distinct regulatory measures have been established to try to deal with research misconduct and conflict of interest. To decrease research misconduct, the emphasis has been on education aimed at promoting an understanding of and commitment to research integrity. To decrease the impact of confli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grinnell, Frederick
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: American Society of Microbiology 2014
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278469/
id pubmed-4278469
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-42784692015-01-08 The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment Grinnell, Frederick New Perspectives on Research Integrity Quite distinct regulatory measures have been established to try to deal with research misconduct and conflict of interest. To decrease research misconduct, the emphasis has been on education aimed at promoting an understanding of and commitment to research integrity. To decrease the impact of conflict of interest, the emphasis has been on management of the research environment. In this essay I discuss the idea that research misconduct and its close relative “questionable research practices” should be framed in the context of conflict of interest. If we take seriously the implication of conflict of interest regulations that even a $5,000 financial interest might bias the design, conduct, or reporting of research, then how much more risk of bias will be in play when what is at stake is ongoing funding of short-term research grants on which a researcher’s salary and job depend? Education is important and necessary to promote research integrity but by itself will not be sufficient. Placing problems of research misconduct and questionable research practices in the context of conflict of interest makes it clear that we also will need to develop new approaches to manage the structure of the research environment. One example of such a management strategy would be for NIH to phase in a limit on the overall percentage of a faculty member’s salary permitted to be supported with NIH grant funds, complementing the already existing upper dollar limit that can be used for faculty salaries. American Society of Microbiology 2014-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4278469/ /pubmed/25574270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.851 Text en ©2014 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Grinnell, Frederick
spellingShingle Grinnell, Frederick
The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment
author_facet Grinnell, Frederick
author_sort Grinnell, Frederick
title The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment
title_short The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment
title_full The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment
title_fullStr The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment
title_full_unstemmed The Interrelationship between Research Integrity, Conflict of Interest, and the Research Environment
title_sort interrelationship between research integrity, conflict of interest, and the research environment
description Quite distinct regulatory measures have been established to try to deal with research misconduct and conflict of interest. To decrease research misconduct, the emphasis has been on education aimed at promoting an understanding of and commitment to research integrity. To decrease the impact of conflict of interest, the emphasis has been on management of the research environment. In this essay I discuss the idea that research misconduct and its close relative “questionable research practices” should be framed in the context of conflict of interest. If we take seriously the implication of conflict of interest regulations that even a $5,000 financial interest might bias the design, conduct, or reporting of research, then how much more risk of bias will be in play when what is at stake is ongoing funding of short-term research grants on which a researcher’s salary and job depend? Education is important and necessary to promote research integrity but by itself will not be sufficient. Placing problems of research misconduct and questionable research practices in the context of conflict of interest makes it clear that we also will need to develop new approaches to manage the structure of the research environment. One example of such a management strategy would be for NIH to phase in a limit on the overall percentage of a faculty member’s salary permitted to be supported with NIH grant funds, complementing the already existing upper dollar limit that can be used for faculty salaries.
publisher American Society of Microbiology
publishDate 2014
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278469/
_version_ 1613171274418225152