Granger causality revisited

This technical paper offers a critical re-evaluation of (spectral) Granger causality measures in the analysis of biological timeseries. Using realistic (neural mass) models of coupled neuronal dynamics, we evaluate the robustness of parametric and nonparametric Granger causality. Starting from a bro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Friston, Karl J., Bastos, André M., Oswal, Ashwini, van Wijk, Bernadette, Richter, Craig, Litvak, Vladimir
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Academic Press 2014
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176655/
id pubmed-4176655
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-41766552014-11-01 Granger causality revisited Friston, Karl J. Bastos, André M. Oswal, Ashwini van Wijk, Bernadette Richter, Craig Litvak, Vladimir Technical Note This technical paper offers a critical re-evaluation of (spectral) Granger causality measures in the analysis of biological timeseries. Using realistic (neural mass) models of coupled neuronal dynamics, we evaluate the robustness of parametric and nonparametric Granger causality. Starting from a broad class of generative (state-space) models of neuronal dynamics, we show how their Volterra kernels prescribe the second-order statistics of their response to random fluctuations; characterised in terms of cross-spectral density, cross-covariance, autoregressive coefficients and directed transfer functions. These quantities in turn specify Granger causality — providing a direct (analytic) link between the parameters of a generative model and the expected Granger causality. We use this link to show that Granger causality measures based upon autoregressive models can become unreliable when the underlying dynamics is dominated by slow (unstable) modes — as quantified by the principal Lyapunov exponent. However, nonparametric measures based on causal spectral factors are robust to dynamical instability. We then demonstrate how both parametric and nonparametric spectral causality measures can become unreliable in the presence of measurement noise. Finally, we show that this problem can be finessed by deriving spectral causality measures from Volterra kernels, estimated using dynamic causal modelling. Academic Press 2014-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4176655/ /pubmed/25003817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.062 Text en © 2014 The Authors
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Friston, Karl J.
Bastos, André M.
Oswal, Ashwini
van Wijk, Bernadette
Richter, Craig
Litvak, Vladimir
spellingShingle Friston, Karl J.
Bastos, André M.
Oswal, Ashwini
van Wijk, Bernadette
Richter, Craig
Litvak, Vladimir
Granger causality revisited
author_facet Friston, Karl J.
Bastos, André M.
Oswal, Ashwini
van Wijk, Bernadette
Richter, Craig
Litvak, Vladimir
author_sort Friston, Karl J.
title Granger causality revisited
title_short Granger causality revisited
title_full Granger causality revisited
title_fullStr Granger causality revisited
title_full_unstemmed Granger causality revisited
title_sort granger causality revisited
description This technical paper offers a critical re-evaluation of (spectral) Granger causality measures in the analysis of biological timeseries. Using realistic (neural mass) models of coupled neuronal dynamics, we evaluate the robustness of parametric and nonparametric Granger causality. Starting from a broad class of generative (state-space) models of neuronal dynamics, we show how their Volterra kernels prescribe the second-order statistics of their response to random fluctuations; characterised in terms of cross-spectral density, cross-covariance, autoregressive coefficients and directed transfer functions. These quantities in turn specify Granger causality — providing a direct (analytic) link between the parameters of a generative model and the expected Granger causality. We use this link to show that Granger causality measures based upon autoregressive models can become unreliable when the underlying dynamics is dominated by slow (unstable) modes — as quantified by the principal Lyapunov exponent. However, nonparametric measures based on causal spectral factors are robust to dynamical instability. We then demonstrate how both parametric and nonparametric spectral causality measures can become unreliable in the presence of measurement noise. Finally, we show that this problem can be finessed by deriving spectral causality measures from Volterra kernels, estimated using dynamic causal modelling.
publisher Academic Press
publishDate 2014
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176655/
_version_ 1613137850158546944