Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads

To assess the functional capacities of microbial communities, including those inhabiting the human body, shotgun metagenomic reads are often aligned to a database of known genes. Such homology-based annotation practices critically rely on the assumption that short reads can map to orthologous genes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carr, Rogan, Borenstein, Elhanan
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141809/
id pubmed-4141809
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-41418092014-08-25 Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads Carr, Rogan Borenstein, Elhanan Research Article To assess the functional capacities of microbial communities, including those inhabiting the human body, shotgun metagenomic reads are often aligned to a database of known genes. Such homology-based annotation practices critically rely on the assumption that short reads can map to orthologous genes of similar function. This assumption, however, and the various factors that impact short read annotation, have not been systematically evaluated. To address this challenge, we generated an extremely large database of simulated reads (totaling 15.9 Gb), spanning over 500,000 microbial genes and 170 curated genomes and including, for many genomes, every possible read of a given length. We annotated each read using common metagenomic protocols, fully characterizing the effect of read length, sequencing error, phylogeny, database coverage, and mapping parameters. We additionally rigorously quantified gene-, genome-, and protocol-specific annotation biases. Overall, our findings provide a first comprehensive evaluation of the capabilities and limitations of functional metagenomic annotation, providing crucial goal-specific best-practice guidelines to inform future metagenomic research. Public Library of Science 2014-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4141809/ /pubmed/25148512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105776 Text en © 2014 Carr, Borenstein http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Carr, Rogan
Borenstein, Elhanan
spellingShingle Carr, Rogan
Borenstein, Elhanan
Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads
author_facet Carr, Rogan
Borenstein, Elhanan
author_sort Carr, Rogan
title Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads
title_short Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads
title_full Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Functional Metagenomic Annotation and the Mappability of Short Reads
title_sort comparative analysis of functional metagenomic annotation and the mappability of short reads
description To assess the functional capacities of microbial communities, including those inhabiting the human body, shotgun metagenomic reads are often aligned to a database of known genes. Such homology-based annotation practices critically rely on the assumption that short reads can map to orthologous genes of similar function. This assumption, however, and the various factors that impact short read annotation, have not been systematically evaluated. To address this challenge, we generated an extremely large database of simulated reads (totaling 15.9 Gb), spanning over 500,000 microbial genes and 170 curated genomes and including, for many genomes, every possible read of a given length. We annotated each read using common metagenomic protocols, fully characterizing the effect of read length, sequencing error, phylogeny, database coverage, and mapping parameters. We additionally rigorously quantified gene-, genome-, and protocol-specific annotation biases. Overall, our findings provide a first comprehensive evaluation of the capabilities and limitations of functional metagenomic annotation, providing crucial goal-specific best-practice guidelines to inform future metagenomic research.
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2014
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141809/
_version_ 1613126810711621632