Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury
The choice of disease-specific versus generic scales is common to many fields of medicine. In the area of traumatic brain injury, evidence is coming forward that disease-specific prognostic models and disease-specific scoring systems are preferable in the intensive care setting. In monitoring progno...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075140/ |
id |
pubmed-4075140 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
pubmed-40751402015-06-11 Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury Maas, Andrew IR Steyerberg, Ewout W Commentary The choice of disease-specific versus generic scales is common to many fields of medicine. In the area of traumatic brain injury, evidence is coming forward that disease-specific prognostic models and disease-specific scoring systems are preferable in the intensive care setting. In monitoring prognosis, the use of a calibration belt in validation studies potentially provides accurate and intuitively attractive insight into performance. This approach deserves further empirical evaluation of its added value as well as its limitations. BioMed Central 2014 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4075140/ /pubmed/25044055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13915 Text en Copyright © 2014 Maas and Steyerberg; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The licensee has exclusive rights to distribute this article, in any medium, for 12 months following its publication. After this time, the article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
repository_type |
Open Access Journal |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
US National Center for Biotechnology Information |
building |
NCBI PubMed |
collection |
Online Access |
language |
English |
format |
Online |
author |
Maas, Andrew IR Steyerberg, Ewout W |
spellingShingle |
Maas, Andrew IR Steyerberg, Ewout W Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury |
author_facet |
Maas, Andrew IR Steyerberg, Ewout W |
author_sort |
Maas, Andrew IR |
title |
Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury |
title_short |
Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury |
title_full |
Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury |
title_fullStr |
Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury |
title_sort |
monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury |
description |
The choice of disease-specific versus generic scales is common to many fields of medicine. In the area of traumatic brain injury, evidence is coming forward that disease-specific prognostic models and disease-specific scoring systems are preferable in the intensive care setting. In monitoring prognosis, the use of a calibration belt in validation studies potentially provides accurate and intuitively attractive insight into performance. This approach deserves further empirical evaluation of its added value as well as its limitations. |
publisher |
BioMed Central |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075140/ |
_version_ |
1612107607873421312 |