Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity

Combinatorial communication, in which two signals are used together to achieve an effect that is different to the sum of the effects of the component parts, is apparently rare in nature: it is ubiquitous in human language, appears to exist in a simple form in some non-human primates, but has not bee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott-Phillips, Thomas C., Gurney, James, Ivens, Alasdair, Diggle, Stephen P., Popat, Roman
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997515/
id pubmed-3997515
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-39975152014-04-29 Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. Gurney, James Ivens, Alasdair Diggle, Stephen P. Popat, Roman Research Article Combinatorial communication, in which two signals are used together to achieve an effect that is different to the sum of the effects of the component parts, is apparently rare in nature: it is ubiquitous in human language, appears to exist in a simple form in some non-human primates, but has not been demonstrated in other species. This observed distribution has led to the pair of related suggestions, that (i) these differences in the complexity of observed communication systems reflect cognitive differences between species; and (ii) that the combinations we see in non-human primates may be evolutionary pre-cursors of human language. Here we replicate the landmark experiments on combinatorial communication in non-human primates, but in an entirely different species, unrelated to humans, and with no higher cognition: the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using the same general methods as the primate studies, we find the same general pattern of results: the effect of the combined signal differs from the composite effect of the two individual signals. This suggests that advanced cognitive abilities and large brains do not necessarily explain why some species have combinatorial communication systems and others do not. We thus argue that it is premature to conclude that the systems observed in non-human primates are evolutionarily related to language. Our results illustrate the value of an extremely broad approach to comparative research. Public Library of Science 2014-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3997515/ /pubmed/24759740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095929 Text en © 2014 Scott-Phillips et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Scott-Phillips, Thomas C.
Gurney, James
Ivens, Alasdair
Diggle, Stephen P.
Popat, Roman
spellingShingle Scott-Phillips, Thomas C.
Gurney, James
Ivens, Alasdair
Diggle, Stephen P.
Popat, Roman
Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity
author_facet Scott-Phillips, Thomas C.
Gurney, James
Ivens, Alasdair
Diggle, Stephen P.
Popat, Roman
author_sort Scott-Phillips, Thomas C.
title Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity
title_short Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity
title_full Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity
title_fullStr Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity
title_full_unstemmed Combinatorial Communication in Bacteria: Implications for the Origins of Linguistic Generativity
title_sort combinatorial communication in bacteria: implications for the origins of linguistic generativity
description Combinatorial communication, in which two signals are used together to achieve an effect that is different to the sum of the effects of the component parts, is apparently rare in nature: it is ubiquitous in human language, appears to exist in a simple form in some non-human primates, but has not been demonstrated in other species. This observed distribution has led to the pair of related suggestions, that (i) these differences in the complexity of observed communication systems reflect cognitive differences between species; and (ii) that the combinations we see in non-human primates may be evolutionary pre-cursors of human language. Here we replicate the landmark experiments on combinatorial communication in non-human primates, but in an entirely different species, unrelated to humans, and with no higher cognition: the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using the same general methods as the primate studies, we find the same general pattern of results: the effect of the combined signal differs from the composite effect of the two individual signals. This suggests that advanced cognitive abilities and large brains do not necessarily explain why some species have combinatorial communication systems and others do not. We thus argue that it is premature to conclude that the systems observed in non-human primates are evolutionarily related to language. Our results illustrate the value of an extremely broad approach to comparative research.
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2014
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3997515/
_version_ 1612081647376662528