Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same

Purpose. In November 2009, the U.S. Preventative Service Task Force (USPSTF) revised their breast cancer screening guidelines. We evaluated the pattern of screening subsequent to the altered guidelines in a cohort of women. Methods. Our database was queried for the following variables: age, race, m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Friedman, Erica B., Chun, Jennifer, Schnabel, Freya, Schwartz, Shira, Law, Sidney, Billig, Jessica, Ivanoff, Erin, Moy, Linda, Axelrod, Deborah, Guth, Amber
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789493/
id pubmed-3789493
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-37894932013-10-24 Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same Friedman, Erica B. Chun, Jennifer Schnabel, Freya Schwartz, Shira Law, Sidney Billig, Jessica Ivanoff, Erin Moy, Linda Axelrod, Deborah Guth, Amber Clinical Study Purpose. In November 2009, the U.S. Preventative Service Task Force (USPSTF) revised their breast cancer screening guidelines. We evaluated the pattern of screening subsequent to the altered guidelines in a cohort of women. Methods. Our database was queried for the following variables: age, race, method of diagnosis, mass palpability, screening frequency, histology, and stage. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results. 1112 women were diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2010 to 2012. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. Most cancers were detected on mammography (61%). The majority of patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (59%), stage 0 (23%), and stage 1 (50%) cancers. The frequency of screening did not change significantly over time (P = 0.30). However, nonregular screeners had an increased risk of being diagnosed with later stage breast cancer (P < 0.001) and were more likely to present with a palpable mass compared to regular screeners (56% versus 21%; P < 0.001). Conclusions. In our study, screening behavior did not significantly change in the years following the USPSTF guidelines. These results suggest that women who are not screened annually are at increased risk of a delay in breast cancer diagnosis, which may impact treatment options and outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3789493/ /pubmed/24159387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/327567 Text en Copyright © 2013 Erica B. Friedman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Friedman, Erica B.
Chun, Jennifer
Schnabel, Freya
Schwartz, Shira
Law, Sidney
Billig, Jessica
Ivanoff, Erin
Moy, Linda
Axelrod, Deborah
Guth, Amber
spellingShingle Friedman, Erica B.
Chun, Jennifer
Schnabel, Freya
Schwartz, Shira
Law, Sidney
Billig, Jessica
Ivanoff, Erin
Moy, Linda
Axelrod, Deborah
Guth, Amber
Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
author_facet Friedman, Erica B.
Chun, Jennifer
Schnabel, Freya
Schwartz, Shira
Law, Sidney
Billig, Jessica
Ivanoff, Erin
Moy, Linda
Axelrod, Deborah
Guth, Amber
author_sort Friedman, Erica B.
title Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
title_short Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
title_full Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
title_fullStr Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
title_full_unstemmed Screening prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
title_sort screening prior to breast cancer diagnosis: the more things change, the more they stay the same
description Purpose. In November 2009, the U.S. Preventative Service Task Force (USPSTF) revised their breast cancer screening guidelines. We evaluated the pattern of screening subsequent to the altered guidelines in a cohort of women. Methods. Our database was queried for the following variables: age, race, method of diagnosis, mass palpability, screening frequency, histology, and stage. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results. 1112 women were diagnosed with breast cancer from January 2010 to 2012. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. Most cancers were detected on mammography (61%). The majority of patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (59%), stage 0 (23%), and stage 1 (50%) cancers. The frequency of screening did not change significantly over time (P = 0.30). However, nonregular screeners had an increased risk of being diagnosed with later stage breast cancer (P < 0.001) and were more likely to present with a palpable mass compared to regular screeners (56% versus 21%; P < 0.001). Conclusions. In our study, screening behavior did not significantly change in the years following the USPSTF guidelines. These results suggest that women who are not screened annually are at increased risk of a delay in breast cancer diagnosis, which may impact treatment options and outcomes.
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
publishDate 2013
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3789493/
_version_ 1612016003755016192