Application of Quantitative MRI for Brain Tissue Segmentation at 1.5 T and 3.0 T Field Strengths

Application of Quantitative MRI for Brain Tissue Segmentation at 1.5 T and 3.0 T Field Strengths

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	West, Janne, Blystad, Ida, Engström, Maria, Warntjes, Jan B. M., Lundberg, Peter
Format:	Online
Language:	English
Published:	Public Library of Science 2013
Online Access:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774721/

Similar Items

Modeling the Presence of Myelin and Edema in the Brain Based on Multi-Parametric Quantitative MRI
by: Warntjes, Marcel, et al.
Published: (2016)

Brain Characterization Using Normalized Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by: Warntjes, Jan B. M., et al.
Published: (2013)

Automated Template-Based Hippocampal Segmentations from MRI: The Effects of 1.5T or 3T Field Strength on Accuracy
by: Macdonald, Kate E., et al.
Published: (2014)

Increased fMRI Sensitivity at Equal Data Burden Using Averaged Shifted Echo Acquisition
by: Witt, Suzanne T., et al.
Published: (2016)

Multi-Parametric Representation of Voxel-Based Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by: Engström, Maria, et al.
Published: (2014)

Comparison of semi-automated methods to quantify infarct size and area at risk by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths
by: Khan, Jamal N, et al.
Published: (2015)

Manual versus Automated Carotid Artery Plaque Component Segmentation in High and Lower Quality 3.0 Tesla MRI Scans
by: Smits, Loek P., et al.
Published: (2016)

T-staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3.0 Tesla MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla
by: Maas, Monique, et al.
Published: (2011)

Implementation of a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MR system in pediatric neuro-oncological surgery: feasibility and correlation with early postoperative high-field strength MRI
by: Kubben, P. L., et al.
Published: (2012)

Pathological Alterations and Stress Responses near DBS Electrodes after MRI Scans at 7.0T, 3.0T and 1.5T: An In Vivo Comparative Study
by: Shi, Lin, et al.
Published: (2014)

Quantitative Liver MRI Combining Phase Contrast Imaging, Elastography, and DWI: Assessment of Reproducibility and Postprandial Effect at 3.0 T
by: Jajamovich, Guido H., et al.
Published: (2014)

Quantitative assessment of physiological cerebrospinal fluid flow in the cervical spinal canal with 3.0T phase-contrast cine MRI☆
by: Shang, Hua, et al.
Published: (2012)

Quantitative methods in high field MRI
by: Mougin, Olivier
Published: (2010)

IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T
by: Cui, Yong, et al.
Published: (2015)

Preliminary Experience Using Dynamic MRI at 3.0 Tesla for Evaluation of Soft Tissue Tumors
by: Park, Michael Yong, et al.
Published: (2013)

Automated segmentation of cerebral deep gray matter from MRI scans: effect of field strength on sensitivity and reliability
by: Renxin Chu, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)

Breast Tissue 3D Segmentation and Visualization on MRI
by: Song, Hong, et al.
Published: (2013)

Comparison of temperature measurements of pacemaker leads in a 1.0T high field open MRI and a 1.5T classic cylindrical MRI: initial results
by: Seitz, Sebastian A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Fetal blood flow measured using phase contrast MRI-comparison of image quality and flow volume at 1.5T with 3.0T
by: Tsai-Goodman, Beverly, et al.
Published: (2015)

Development 3.0
by: Devarajan, Shantayanan
Published: (2012)

EcoGene 3.0
by: Zhou, Jindan, et al.
Published: (2013)

Web 3.0 technology
Published: (2013)

Shopping 3.0
Published: (2012)

PRED Bank 3.0
Published: (2003)

The Tourist Gaze 3.0
Published: (2014)

Customer Experience 3.0
Published: (2014)

The Windows 3.0 environment
by: Don, Dennis, et al.
Published: (1991)

Příroda 3.0 nebo 1.0 návraty?
by: Jana Dlouhá
Published: (2018-08-01)

Watershed segmentation of basal left ventricle for quantitation of cine cardiac MRI function
by: Lu, Yingli, et al.
Published: (2011)

Gd2O3 nanoparticles in hematopoietic cells for MRI contrast enhancement
by: Hedlund, Anna, et al.
Published: (2011)

HR 3.0: Are we there yet?
by: Javier, Bajer
Published: (2016)

Social Media Recruitment 3.0
by: Helle Kryger, Aggerholm, et al.
Published: (2018)

Sensitivity to White Matter fMRI Activation Increases with Field Strength
by: Mazerolle, Erin L., et al.
Published: (2013)

Minimum Field Strength Simulator for Proton Density Weighted MRI
by: Wu, Ziyue, et al.
Published: (2016)

Brain white and gray matter anatomy of MRI segmentation based on tissue evaluation
by: Salih , Qussay Abbas, et al.
Published: (2005)

Automatic Segmentation of Eight Tissue Classes in Neonatal Brain MRI
by: Anbeek, Petronella, et al.
Published: (2013)

Giant low-field magnetocaloric effect in single-crystalline EuTi0.85Nb0.15O3
by: S. Roy, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

CMR in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: comparison at 1.5T and at 3.0T
by: Nguyen, Kim-Lien, et al.
Published: (2012)

Cardiac MR imaging and MR angiography in pediatric congenital heart disease: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
by: Nguyen, KL, et al.
Published: (2013)

Intersite reproducibility of myocardial assessment of T1 and partition coefficient on phantom and one volunteer at 1.5T and 3.0T
by: Falque, Claire, et al.
Published: (2014)