Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges

Mainly, two statistical methodologies are applicable to the design and analysis of clinical trials: frequentist and Bayesian. Most traditional clinical trial designs are based on frequentist statistics. In frequentist statistics prior information is utilized formally only in the design of a clinical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gupta, Sandeep K
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657986/
id pubmed-3657986
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-36579862013-06-17 Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges Gupta, Sandeep K Educational Forum Mainly, two statistical methodologies are applicable to the design and analysis of clinical trials: frequentist and Bayesian. Most traditional clinical trial designs are based on frequentist statistics. In frequentist statistics prior information is utilized formally only in the design of a clinical trial but not in the analysis of the data. On the other hand, Bayesian statistics provide a formal mathematical method for combining prior information with current information at the design stage, during the conduct of the trial, and at the analysis stage. It is easier to implement adaptive trial designs using Bayesian methods than frequentist methods. The Bayesian approach can also be applied for post-marketing surveillance purposes and in meta-analysis. The basic tenets of good trial design are same for both Bayesian and frequentist trials. It has been recommended that the type of analysis to be used (Bayesian or frequentist) should be chosen beforehand. Switching to an analysis method that produces a more favorable outcome after observing the data is not recommended. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3657986/ /pubmed/23776799 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.96789 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Gupta, Sandeep K
spellingShingle Gupta, Sandeep K
Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges
author_facet Gupta, Sandeep K
author_sort Gupta, Sandeep K
title Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges
title_short Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges
title_full Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges
title_fullStr Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges
title_full_unstemmed Use of Bayesian statistics in drug development: Advantages and challenges
title_sort use of bayesian statistics in drug development: advantages and challenges
description Mainly, two statistical methodologies are applicable to the design and analysis of clinical trials: frequentist and Bayesian. Most traditional clinical trial designs are based on frequentist statistics. In frequentist statistics prior information is utilized formally only in the design of a clinical trial but not in the analysis of the data. On the other hand, Bayesian statistics provide a formal mathematical method for combining prior information with current information at the design stage, during the conduct of the trial, and at the analysis stage. It is easier to implement adaptive trial designs using Bayesian methods than frequentist methods. The Bayesian approach can also be applied for post-marketing surveillance purposes and in meta-analysis. The basic tenets of good trial design are same for both Bayesian and frequentist trials. It has been recommended that the type of analysis to be used (Bayesian or frequentist) should be chosen beforehand. Switching to an analysis method that produces a more favorable outcome after observing the data is not recommended.
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
publishDate 2012
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3657986/
_version_ 1611979017483714560