Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment

Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Classic moral dilemmas are often defined by the conflict between a putatively rational response to maximize aggregate welfare (i.e., the utilitarian judgment) and an emotional aversion to harm (i.e., the non-utilitarian judgment). Here, we address two ques...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel, Young, Liane
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2013
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617220/
id pubmed-3617220
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-36172202013-04-16 Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel Young, Liane Research Article Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Classic moral dilemmas are often defined by the conflict between a putatively rational response to maximize aggregate welfare (i.e., the utilitarian judgment) and an emotional aversion to harm (i.e., the non-utilitarian judgment). Here, we address two questions. First, what specific aspect of emotional responding is relevant for these judgments? Second, is this aspect of emotional responding selectively reduced in utilitarians or enhanced in non-utilitarians? The results reveal a key relationship between moral judgment and empathic concern in particular (i.e., feelings of warmth and compassion in response to someone in distress). Utilitarian participants showed significantly reduced empathic concern on an independent empathy measure. These findings therefore reveal diminished empathic concern in utilitarian moral judges. Public Library of Science 2013-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3617220/ /pubmed/23593213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418 Text en © 2013 Gleichgerrcht, Young http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel
Young, Liane
spellingShingle Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel
Young, Liane
Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
author_facet Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel
Young, Liane
author_sort Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel
title Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
title_short Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
title_full Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
title_fullStr Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
title_full_unstemmed Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
title_sort low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment
description Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Classic moral dilemmas are often defined by the conflict between a putatively rational response to maximize aggregate welfare (i.e., the utilitarian judgment) and an emotional aversion to harm (i.e., the non-utilitarian judgment). Here, we address two questions. First, what specific aspect of emotional responding is relevant for these judgments? Second, is this aspect of emotional responding selectively reduced in utilitarians or enhanced in non-utilitarians? The results reveal a key relationship between moral judgment and empathic concern in particular (i.e., feelings of warmth and compassion in response to someone in distress). Utilitarian participants showed significantly reduced empathic concern on an independent empathy measure. These findings therefore reveal diminished empathic concern in utilitarian moral judges.
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2013
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617220/
_version_ 1611967822414479360