Reply: benefits of screening cancer patients for distress still not demonstrated

Reply: benefits of screening cancer patients for distress still not demonstrated

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Carlson, L E, Waller, A, Groff, S L, Zhong, L, Bultz, B D
Format:	Online
Language:	English
Published:	Nature Publishing Group 2013
Online Access:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3593563/

Similar Items

Reply: Comment on ‘Online screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, in newly diagnosed oncology outpatients: randomised controlled trial of computerised vs personalised triage' – Psychological distress in patients with cancer: is screening the effective solution?
by: Carlson, L E, et al.
Published: (2013)

Benefits of screening cancer patients for distress still not demonstrated
by: Coyne, J C
Published: (2013)

Online screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, in newly diagnosed oncology outpatients: randomised controlled trial of computerised vs personalised triage
by: Carlson, L E, et al.
Published: (2012)

Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: common problems in cancer outpatients over one year in usual care: associations with marital status, sex, and age
by: Giese-Davis, Janine, et al.
Published: (2012)

Patient Care and Outcomes: Why Cancer Care Should Screen for Distress, the 6th Vital Sign
by: Bultz, Barry D.
Published: (2016)

Benefits of psychosocial oncology care: Improved quality of life and medical cost offset
by: Carlson, Linda E, et al.
Published: (2003)

Individualized quality of life, standardized quality of life, and distress in patients undergoing a phase I trial of the novel therapeutic Reolysin (reovirus)
by: Carlson, Linda E, et al.
Published: (2005)

Reply to “Triclocarban and Health: the Jury Is Still Out”
by: Pischel, Lauren, et al.
Published: (2016)

A pilot study screening for spiritual distress in patients at Hospice Africa Uganda
by: K. Cercone, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

Distress Screening Using Distress Thermometer
by: Yasri, Sora, et al.
Published: (2014)

Comment on ‘Psychological distress in patients with cancer: is screening the effective solution?'
by: Dekker, J, et al.
Published: (2013)

Reply: cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer
by: Sharp, L, et al.
Published: (2013)

Reply: Endocrine therapy in prostate cancer: time for reappraisal of risks, benefits and cost-effectiveness?
by: Rosario, D J, et al.
Published: (2013)

Failure of the Anticoagulant Therapy and Psychological Distress: Still Far From a Bridge
by: Federica Galli, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Reply to ‘Sleep duration and breast cancer risk in the breast cancer detection demonstration project follow-up cohort: true associations or bias?'
by: Qian, X, et al.
Published: (2015)

Distress Screening in Chronic Disease: Essential for Cancer Survivors
by: Petty, Lorie, et al.
Published: (2014)

Unresolved problems with distress screening
by: Fielding, R, et al.
Published: (2013)

Reply.
by: Adams, L., et al.
Published: (2015)

Cancer Care and the Role of Psychosocial Oncology: Where are We and Where are We Going?
by: Bultz, Barry D.
Published: (2016)

Screening for Emotional Distress in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments
by: Vodermaier, Andrea, et al.
Published: (2009)

Screening for psychological distress in follow-up care to identify head and neck cancer patients with untreated distress
by: Krebber, Anne-Marie H., et al.
Published: (2015)

Distress Screening Using Distress Thermometer in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy and Evaluation of Causal Factors Predicting Occurrence of Distress
by: Lewis, Shirley, et al.
Published: (2013)

Reply
by: Vowles, Kevin E., et al.
Published: (2015)

Authors’ reply
by: Mishra, L D, et al.
Published: (2011)

Authors’ reply
by: Rao, Sanjay, et al.
Published: (2011)

Pain and Distress in Cancer Patients
by: Anna Burger-Szabo, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)

Authors' Reply
by: Mackie, Jocelyn E, et al.
Published: (2006)

Reply: Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in Nijmegen
by: Verbeek, A L M, et al.
Published: (2011)

Influenza vaccination in the elderly: why are the overall benefits still hotly debated?
by: TRUCCHI, C., et al.
Published: (2015)

Author's Reply
by: Kravitz, Richard L
Published: (2006)

Cost-Effective Screening for Trichomoniasis—reply to Dr. Schwebke
by: Sorvillo, Frank, et al.
Published: (2002)

Recognising the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an opportunity to target improvement
by: O'Donoghue, C, et al.
Published: (2013)

AUTHOR'S REPLY
by: Chlosta, Piotr L., et al.
Published: (2015)

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: To Screen or Not to Screen?: Is this really still a question?
by: Simmons, David, et al.
Published: (2013)

Reply: Ionising radiation and occupational cancer in Britain
by: Rushton, L, et al.
Published: (2012)

Referral Letter with an Attached Structured Reply Form: Is it A Solution for Not Getting Replies
by: Ramanayake, R. P. J. C., et al.
Published: (2013)

Not All Patients With Non-erosive Reflux Disease Share Psychological Distress as Main Mechanism of Disease: Author's Reply
by: Nam, Su Youn
Published: (2014)

Author reply
by: Campbell, D., et al.
Published: (2013)

Authors’ reply
by: Gautam, Parshotam L., et al.
Published: (2012)

Authors’ reply
by: Krishna, Bhuvana, et al.
Published: (2014)