Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric

The de-Sitter metric is a special form of the non-static Friedmann metric, and appears to be genuinely non-static since it describes the initial exponential expansion of the Big Bang universe. However, the de Sitter metric appears to be perfectly static in the Schwarzschild frame where the vacuum fl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mitra, Abhas
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513772/
id pubmed-3513772
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-35137722012-12-04 Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric Mitra, Abhas Article The de-Sitter metric is a special form of the non-static Friedmann metric, and appears to be genuinely non-static since it describes the initial exponential expansion of the Big Bang universe. However, the de Sitter metric appears to be perfectly static in the Schwarzschild frame where the vacuum fluid is supposed to be in motion. Here we highlight the conflicts between the static and non-static versions of the de-Sitter metric from a physical perspective. In particular, while the “Principle of Energy Conservation” is honored in one case, the same is badly violated for the other. However, we offer a partial resolution of such conflicts by deriving the static de Sitter metric by solving the relevant field equations. It is seen that, it is the very special vacuum equation of state pressure = –density which results in the static form even when the vacuum fluid is supposed to be in motion. Nature Publishing Group 2012-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3513772/ /pubmed/23213359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00923 Text en Copyright © 2012, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareALike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Mitra, Abhas
spellingShingle Mitra, Abhas
Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric
author_facet Mitra, Abhas
author_sort Mitra, Abhas
title Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric
title_short Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric
title_full Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric
title_fullStr Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric
title_full_unstemmed Interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de Sitter metric
title_sort interpretational conflicts between the static and non-static forms of the de sitter metric
description The de-Sitter metric is a special form of the non-static Friedmann metric, and appears to be genuinely non-static since it describes the initial exponential expansion of the Big Bang universe. However, the de Sitter metric appears to be perfectly static in the Schwarzschild frame where the vacuum fluid is supposed to be in motion. Here we highlight the conflicts between the static and non-static versions of the de-Sitter metric from a physical perspective. In particular, while the “Principle of Energy Conservation” is honored in one case, the same is badly violated for the other. However, we offer a partial resolution of such conflicts by deriving the static de Sitter metric by solving the relevant field equations. It is seen that, it is the very special vacuum equation of state pressure = –density which results in the static form even when the vacuum fluid is supposed to be in motion.
publisher Nature Publishing Group
publishDate 2012
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513772/
_version_ 1611937833703964672