Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms
Calculating verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) ad modum Popper is a quantitative alternative to the usual pros and cons in migraine and cluster headache mechanisms. The following items were evaluated: dilation of large cranial arteries during migraine; CGRP increase during migraine; migraine as a b...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Milan
2010
|
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3452275/ |
| id |
pubmed-3452275 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
pubmed-34522752012-11-29 Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms Tfelt-Hansen, Peer Carsten Review Article Calculating verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) ad modum Popper is a quantitative alternative to the usual pros and cons in migraine and cluster headache mechanisms. The following items were evaluated: dilation of large cranial arteries during migraine; CGRP increase during migraine; migraine as a brain disorder; aura and migraine headache; brain stem activation during migraine; rCBF in migraine without aura; NO and pathophysiology of migraine; neurogenic inflammation and migraine; aura in cluster headache; and hypothalamic activation in cluster headache. It is concluded that verisimilitude calculations can be helpful when judging pathophysiological problems in migraine and cluster headache. Springer Milan 2010-07-07 2010-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3452275/ /pubmed/20607582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0232-1 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2010 |
| repository_type |
Open Access Journal |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
US National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| building |
NCBI PubMed |
| collection |
Online Access |
| language |
English |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Tfelt-Hansen, Peer Carsten |
| spellingShingle |
Tfelt-Hansen, Peer Carsten Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms |
| author_facet |
Tfelt-Hansen, Peer Carsten |
| author_sort |
Tfelt-Hansen, Peer Carsten |
| title |
Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms |
| title_short |
Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms |
| title_full |
Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms |
| title_fullStr |
Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms |
| title_sort |
verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: migraine and cluster headache mechanisms |
| description |
Calculating verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) ad modum Popper is a quantitative alternative to the usual pros and cons in migraine and cluster headache mechanisms. The following items were evaluated: dilation of large cranial arteries during migraine; CGRP increase during migraine; migraine as a brain disorder; aura and migraine headache; brain stem activation during migraine; rCBF in migraine without aura; NO and pathophysiology of migraine; neurogenic inflammation and migraine; aura in cluster headache; and hypothalamic activation in cluster headache. It is concluded that verisimilitude calculations can be helpful when judging pathophysiological problems in migraine and cluster headache. |
| publisher |
Springer Milan |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3452275/ |
| _version_ |
1611911388821716992 |