Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information

When patients consult more than one source of information about their medications, they may encounter conflicting information. Although conflicting information has been associated with negative outcomes, including worse medication adherence, little is known about how patients make health decisions w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elstad, Emily, Carpenter, Delesha M., Devellis, Robert F., Blalock, Susan J.
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Co-Action Publishing 2012
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3430944/
id pubmed-3430944
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-34309442012-08-30 Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information Elstad, Emily Carpenter, Delesha M. Devellis, Robert F. Blalock, Susan J. Empirical Studies When patients consult more than one source of information about their medications, they may encounter conflicting information. Although conflicting information has been associated with negative outcomes, including worse medication adherence, little is known about how patients make health decisions when they receive conflicting information. The objective of this study was to explore the decision making strategies that individuals with arthritis use when they receive conflicting medication information. Qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 20 men and women with arthritis. Interview vignettes posed scenarios involving conflicting information from different sources (e.g., doctor, pharmacist, and relative), and respondents were asked how they would respond to the situation. Data analysis involved inductive coding to identify emergent themes and deductive contextualization to make meaning from the emergent themes. In response to conflicting medication information, patients used rules of thumb, trial and error, weighed benefits and risks, and sought more information, especially from a doctor. Patients relied heavily on trial and error when there was no conflicting information involved in the vignette. In contrast, patients used rules of thumb as a unique response to conflicting information. These findings increase our understanding of what patients do when they receive conflicting medication information. Given that patient exposure to conflicting information is likely to increase alongside the proliferation of medication information on the Internet, patients may benefit from assistance in identifying the most appropriate decision strategies for dealing with conflicting information, including information about best information sources. Co-Action Publishing 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3430944/ /pubmed/22943889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v7i0.18523 Text en © 2012 E. Elstad et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Elstad, Emily
Carpenter, Delesha M.
Devellis, Robert F.
Blalock, Susan J.
spellingShingle Elstad, Emily
Carpenter, Delesha M.
Devellis, Robert F.
Blalock, Susan J.
Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information
author_facet Elstad, Emily
Carpenter, Delesha M.
Devellis, Robert F.
Blalock, Susan J.
author_sort Elstad, Emily
title Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information
title_short Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information
title_full Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information
title_fullStr Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information
title_full_unstemmed Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information
title_sort patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information
description When patients consult more than one source of information about their medications, they may encounter conflicting information. Although conflicting information has been associated with negative outcomes, including worse medication adherence, little is known about how patients make health decisions when they receive conflicting information. The objective of this study was to explore the decision making strategies that individuals with arthritis use when they receive conflicting medication information. Qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 20 men and women with arthritis. Interview vignettes posed scenarios involving conflicting information from different sources (e.g., doctor, pharmacist, and relative), and respondents were asked how they would respond to the situation. Data analysis involved inductive coding to identify emergent themes and deductive contextualization to make meaning from the emergent themes. In response to conflicting medication information, patients used rules of thumb, trial and error, weighed benefits and risks, and sought more information, especially from a doctor. Patients relied heavily on trial and error when there was no conflicting information involved in the vignette. In contrast, patients used rules of thumb as a unique response to conflicting information. These findings increase our understanding of what patients do when they receive conflicting medication information. Given that patient exposure to conflicting information is likely to increase alongside the proliferation of medication information on the Internet, patients may benefit from assistance in identifying the most appropriate decision strategies for dealing with conflicting information, including information about best information sources.
publisher Co-Action Publishing
publishDate 2012
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3430944/
_version_ 1611553272210915328