Sources of variation in false discovery rate estimation include sample size, correlation, and inherent differences between groups
Main Authors: | Zhang, Jiexin, Coombes, Kevin R |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426804/ |
Similar Items
-
Sample size calculation while controlling false discovery rate for differential expression analysis with RNA-sequencing experiments
by: Bi, Ran, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data
by: Jain, Nitin, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Is Sexual Size Dimorphism Inherent in the Scallop Patinopecten yessoensis?
by: Silina, Alla V.
Published: (2016) -
A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate
by: Broberg, Per
Published: (2005) -
A constrained polynomial regression procedure for estimating the local False Discovery Rate
by: Dalmasso, Cyril, et al.
Published: (2007)