Quality assurance of full field digital mammography

Quality assurance of full field digital mammography

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	van Engen, R
Format:	Online
Language:	English
Published:	BioMed Central 2008
Online Access:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332604/

Similar Items

Full-field digital mammography
by: Bick, U
Published: (2000)

The Dutch experience of digital mammography in screening
by: van Engen, R
Published: (2006)

Full field digital mammography: which equipment?
by: Young, KC
Published: (2008)

Determination of dose delivery accuracy and image quality in full - Field digital mammography
by: E.K. Sosu, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Initial Experience with Combination Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Full Field Digital Mammography or Full Field Digital Mammography Alone in the Screening Environment
by: Destounis, Stamatia, et al.
Published: (2014)

Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria
by: Lalji, U. C., et al.
Published: (2015)

Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography using figure of merit
by: Laila Suryani Elias,, et al.
Published: (2010)

A comparative evaluation of two full-field digital mammography units
by: Smith, D, et al.
Published: (2000)

Comparison of New and Established Full-Field Digital Mammography Systems in Diagnostic Performance
by: Ko, Eun Sook, et al.
Published: (2013)

Which Phantom Is Better for Assessing the Image Quality in Full-Field Digital Mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation Phantom versus Digital Mammography Accreditation Phantom
by: Song, Sung Eun, et al.
Published: (2012)

Comparison of image quality criteria between digital storage phosphor plate in mammography and full-field digital mammography in the detection of breast cancer
by: Tuan Norhafizah binti Tuan Zakaria
Published: (2012)

Image quality of two full field digital mammography using a female breast phantom
by: Kanaga Kumari Chelliah,, et al.
Published: (2009)

Image quality of two full field digital mammography using a female breast phantom
by: Husna Zayadi
Published: (2009)

A comparison of reading times in full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
by: Connor, SJ, et al.
Published: (2012)

Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide
by: Reis, Cláudia, et al.
Published: (2013)

Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide
by: Sa dos Reis, Claudia, et al.
Published: (2013)

The evaluation of four small-field digital mammography systems
by: Lawinski, CP, et al.
Published: (2000)

Full-field digital mammography: a retrograde step for small screen-detected cancers?
by: Boavida, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography
by: Rob M. G. van Bommel, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

Breast density estimation on full-field-digital mammography (ffdm) by general radiologists: comparison of bi-rads and tabar classification sytems
by: Hassan, Radhiana, et al.
Published: (2014)

Reproducibility of mammographic parenchymal patterns and Breast Density on Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM): comparison of the two classification systems
by: Hassan, Radhiana, et al.
Published: (2015)

Assessment of full field digital mammography (FFDM) detected microcalcification is not hindered by low spatial resolution
by: Bartella, L, et al.
Published: (2002)

Impact of full-field digital mammography on diagnostic work-up and surgical management of mammographic microcalcification
by: Bundred, SM, et al.
Published: (2012)

Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
by: Vachon, Celine M, et al.
Published: (2013)

Dose Reduction in Automatic Optimization Parameter of Full Field Digital Mammography: Breast Phantom Study
by: Ko, Myung-Su, et al.
Published: (2013)

A comparison of calibration data from full field digital mammography units for breast density measurements
by: Fowler, Erin EE, et al.
Published: (2013)

Is Age-targeted full-field digital mammography screening cost-effective in emerging countries? A micro simulation model
by: Souza, Fabiano Hahn, et al.
Published: (2013)

Detection of Breast Cancer in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Groups Using Computer-Aided Detection with Full-Field Digital Mammography
by: Park, Chang Suk, et al.
Published: (2013)

Who could benefit the most from using a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography?
by: Jung, Na Young, et al.
Published: (2014)

Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography
by: Michail, Christos M., et al.
Published: (2014)

A New Full-Field Digital Mammography System with and without the Use of an Advanced Post-Processing Algorithm: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance
by: Ahn, Hye Shin, et al.
Published: (2014)

X-Ray Induced Formation of γ-H2AX Foci after Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast-Tomosynthesis
by: Schwab, Siegfried A., et al.
Published: (2013)

DMISTifying digital mammography in the USA
by: D'Orsi, C
Published: (2006)

Digital mammography: the human factors implications
by: Brace, C, et al.
Published: (2006)

Digital mammography in the United Kingdom: the reality
by: Wallis, M
Published: (2006)

Update on new technologies in digital mammography
by: Patterson, Stephanie K, et al.
Published: (2014)

Awareness of quality assurance procedures in digital preservation
by: Andrew, Williamson
Published: (2004)

Quality assurance model for digital adult education materials
by: Helen, Dimou, et al.
Published: (2016)

A survey on mean glandular dose from full-field digital mammography systems, operate using Mo/Mo and W/Rh target/filter combinations
by: Jamal, Noriah, et al.
Published: (2013)

Image quality and compression force: the forgotten link in optimisation of digital mammography?
by: O'Leary, D, et al.
Published: (2011)