Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship
This paper analyses the nature of the relationship between risk and responsibility. Since neither the concept of risk nor the concept of responsibility has an unequivocal definition, it is obvious that there is no single interpretation of their relationship. After introducing the different meanings...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2010
|
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275725/ |
| id |
pubmed-3275725 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
pubmed-32757252012-02-21 Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship Kermisch, Céline Article This paper analyses the nature of the relationship between risk and responsibility. Since neither the concept of risk nor the concept of responsibility has an unequivocal definition, it is obvious that there is no single interpretation of their relationship. After introducing the different meanings of responsibility used in this paper, we analyse four conceptions of risk. This allows us to make their link with responsibility explicit and to determine if a shift in the connection between risk and responsibility can be outlined. (1) In the engineer’s paradigm, the quantitative conception of risk does not include any concept of responsibility. Their relationship is indirect, the locus of responsibility being risk management. (2) In Mary Douglas’ cultural theory, risks are constructed through the responsibilities they engage. (3) Rayner and (4) Wolff go further by integrating forms of responsibility in the definition of risk itself. Analysis of these four frameworks shows that the concepts of risk and responsibility are increasingly intertwined. This tendency is reinforced by increasing public awareness and a call for the integration of a moral dimension in risk management. Therefore, we suggest that a form of virtue-responsibility should also be integrated in the concept of risk. Springer Netherlands 2010-11-20 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3275725/ /pubmed/21103951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9246-y Text en © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 |
| repository_type |
Open Access Journal |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
US National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| building |
NCBI PubMed |
| collection |
Online Access |
| language |
English |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Kermisch, Céline |
| spellingShingle |
Kermisch, Céline Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship |
| author_facet |
Kermisch, Céline |
| author_sort |
Kermisch, Céline |
| title |
Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship |
| title_short |
Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship |
| title_full |
Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship |
| title_fullStr |
Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship |
| title_sort |
risk and responsibility: a complex and evolving relationship |
| description |
This paper analyses the nature of the relationship between risk and responsibility. Since neither the concept of risk nor the concept of responsibility has an unequivocal definition, it is obvious that there is no single interpretation of their relationship. After introducing the different meanings of responsibility used in this paper, we analyse four conceptions of risk. This allows us to make their link with responsibility explicit and to determine if a shift in the connection between risk and responsibility can be outlined. (1) In the engineer’s paradigm, the quantitative conception of risk does not include any concept of responsibility. Their relationship is indirect, the locus of responsibility being risk management. (2) In Mary Douglas’ cultural theory, risks are constructed through the responsibilities they engage. (3) Rayner and (4) Wolff go further by integrating forms of responsibility in the definition of risk itself. Analysis of these four frameworks shows that the concepts of risk and responsibility are increasingly intertwined. This tendency is reinforced by increasing public awareness and a call for the integration of a moral dimension in risk management. Therefore, we suggest that a form of virtue-responsibility should also be integrated in the concept of risk. |
| publisher |
Springer Netherlands |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275725/ |
| _version_ |
1611504951238852608 |