Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration

Speech is the most important form of human communication but ambient sounds and competing talkers often degrade its acoustics. Fortunately the brain can use visual information, especially its highly precise spatial information, to improve speech comprehension in noisy environments. Previous studies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bishop, Christopher W., Miller, Lee M.
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2011
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3166076/
id pubmed-3166076
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-31660762011-09-09 Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration Bishop, Christopher W. Miller, Lee M. Research Article Speech is the most important form of human communication but ambient sounds and competing talkers often degrade its acoustics. Fortunately the brain can use visual information, especially its highly precise spatial information, to improve speech comprehension in noisy environments. Previous studies have demonstrated that audiovisual integration depends strongly on spatiotemporal factors. However, some integrative phenomena such as McGurk interference persist even with gross spatial disparities, suggesting that spatial alignment is not necessary for robust integration of audiovisual place-of-articulation cues. It is therefore unclear how speech-cues interact with audiovisual spatial integration mechanisms. Here, we combine two well established psychophysical phenomena, the McGurk effect and the ventriloquist's illusion, to explore this dependency. Our results demonstrate that conflicting spatial cues may not interfere with audiovisual integration of speech, but conflicting speech-cues can impede integration in space. This suggests a direct but asymmetrical influence between ventral ‘what’ and dorsal ‘where’ pathways. Public Library of Science 2011-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3166076/ /pubmed/21909378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024016 Text en Bishop, Miller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Bishop, Christopher W.
Miller, Lee M.
spellingShingle Bishop, Christopher W.
Miller, Lee M.
Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration
author_facet Bishop, Christopher W.
Miller, Lee M.
author_sort Bishop, Christopher W.
title Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration
title_short Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration
title_full Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration
title_fullStr Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration
title_full_unstemmed Speech Cues Contribute to Audiovisual Spatial Integration
title_sort speech cues contribute to audiovisual spatial integration
description Speech is the most important form of human communication but ambient sounds and competing talkers often degrade its acoustics. Fortunately the brain can use visual information, especially its highly precise spatial information, to improve speech comprehension in noisy environments. Previous studies have demonstrated that audiovisual integration depends strongly on spatiotemporal factors. However, some integrative phenomena such as McGurk interference persist even with gross spatial disparities, suggesting that spatial alignment is not necessary for robust integration of audiovisual place-of-articulation cues. It is therefore unclear how speech-cues interact with audiovisual spatial integration mechanisms. Here, we combine two well established psychophysical phenomena, the McGurk effect and the ventriloquist's illusion, to explore this dependency. Our results demonstrate that conflicting spatial cues may not interfere with audiovisual integration of speech, but conflicting speech-cues can impede integration in space. This suggests a direct but asymmetrical influence between ventral ‘what’ and dorsal ‘where’ pathways.
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2011
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3166076/
_version_ 1611473472863600640