Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy appears to be a feasible alternative to laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer with similar surgical outcomes and lessened morbidity.
Main Authors: | Taylor, Sarah E., McBee, William C., Richard, Scott D., Edwards, Robert P. |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2011
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148874/ |
Similar Items
-
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer
by: Wang, Yan-zhou, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Quality of life and sexuality in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy alone: A comparison between total laparoscopy and laparotomy
by: Xiao, Meizhu, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Using Three Robotic Arms versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopy in Patients with Cervical Cancer
by: Yim, Ga Won, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Total Microlaparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer
by: Fanfani, Francesco, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
by: Makowski, Marcin, et al.
Published: (2014)