Guilty by stereotypic association: Country animosity and brand prejudice and discrimination
This research tests the proposition that brands suffer prejudice and discrimination due to animosity toward a country with which they have a strong stereotypic association. In the first study, attitudinal data collected across a range of brands that vary in terms of the strength of the brand–country...
Main Authors: | Russell, Cristel Antonia, Russell, Dale W. |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer US
2009
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3093668/ |
Similar Items
-
Progerin guilty of size discrimination
by: Leslie, Mitch
Published: (2013) -
Relationship between Knowledge, Stereotyping, and Prejudice in Interethnic Communication
by: Jonathan Matusitz
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Postoperative pneumoperitoneum: guilty or not guilty?
by: Lee, Chang Ho, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Guilty through association: brand association transfer to brand alliances
by: David, James
Published: (2005) -
Who Are the Guilty?
by: Pearce, J. D. W.
Published: (1955)