Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?

Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy ov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Estève, J., Parker, L., Roy, P., Herrmann, F., Duffy, S., Frappaz, D., Lasset, C., Hill, C., Sancho-Garnier, H., Michaelis, J.
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: 1995
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033839/
id pubmed-2033839
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-20338392009-09-10 Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible? Estève, J. Parker, L. Roy, P. Herrmann, F. Duffy, S. Frappaz, D. Lasset, C. Hill, C. Sancho-Garnier, H. Michaelis, J. Research Article Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy overdiagnosis. It is shown in this paper that screening at a later age may give the same reduction in mortality with possibly less overdiagnosis. However, it is estimated that, even with two screens at 12 and 18 months, the reduction in mortality would not greatly exceed 25%, under realistic hypotheses on the length of the preclinical phase of the disease. The evaluation of the efficacy of this screening strategy would need the recruitment of half a million children per year over 5-7 years and the follow-up of an equal number of controls. Such a trial would improve our knowledge of the natural history of the disease and might help to answer some questions raised recently regarding its biological heterogeneity. 1995-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2033839/ /pubmed/7779698 Text en
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Estève, J.
Parker, L.
Roy, P.
Herrmann, F.
Duffy, S.
Frappaz, D.
Lasset, C.
Hill, C.
Sancho-Garnier, H.
Michaelis, J.
spellingShingle Estève, J.
Parker, L.
Roy, P.
Herrmann, F.
Duffy, S.
Frappaz, D.
Lasset, C.
Hill, C.
Sancho-Garnier, H.
Michaelis, J.
Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
author_facet Estève, J.
Parker, L.
Roy, P.
Herrmann, F.
Duffy, S.
Frappaz, D.
Lasset, C.
Hill, C.
Sancho-Garnier, H.
Michaelis, J.
author_sort Estève, J.
title Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_short Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_full Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_fullStr Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_full_unstemmed Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
title_sort is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?
description Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy overdiagnosis. It is shown in this paper that screening at a later age may give the same reduction in mortality with possibly less overdiagnosis. However, it is estimated that, even with two screens at 12 and 18 months, the reduction in mortality would not greatly exceed 25%, under realistic hypotheses on the length of the preclinical phase of the disease. The evaluation of the efficacy of this screening strategy would need the recruitment of half a million children per year over 5-7 years and the follow-up of an equal number of controls. Such a trial would improve our knowledge of the natural history of the disease and might help to answer some questions raised recently regarding its biological heterogeneity.
publishDate 1995
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033839/
_version_ 1611405098988077056