Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.

We have carried out experiments to determine the response of tumours and normal tissues in the C3H mouse to the combination of lipophilic nitroimidazoles and CCNU, cyclophosphamide or melphalan. The nitroimidazoles studied were Ro 07-1902 (1902) and benznidazole (Ro 07-1051, BENZO). Maximum enhancem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Twentyman, P. R., Workman, P.
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: 1983
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2011422/
id pubmed-2011422
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-20114222009-09-10 Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles. Twentyman, P. R. Workman, P. Research Article We have carried out experiments to determine the response of tumours and normal tissues in the C3H mouse to the combination of lipophilic nitroimidazoles and CCNU, cyclophosphamide or melphalan. The nitroimidazoles studied were Ro 07-1902 (1902) and benznidazole (Ro 07-1051, BENZO). Maximum enhancement of CCNU response in the KHT sarcoma by 2.5 mmol kg-1 1902 or 0.3 mmol kg-1 BENZO occurred at low doses of CCNU where dose modifying factors (DMF) of 2.5-3.0 and 1.5-2.0 respectively were found. The DMFs for depression of white cell count at day 3 were 1.6 and 1.2 respectively whilst the DMFs for LD50/30 were 1.5 and 1.3. There appears, therefore, to be a therapeutic gain at low doses of CCNU of about the same magnitude as produced by 2.5 mmol kg-1 misonidazole. The production of this gain at relatively low doses of BENZO is of possible clinical significance. Some sensitization of the KHT tumour to CCNU by 0.3 mmol kg-1 BENZO was maintained even with an interval of 25 h between BENZO and CCNU injection. A multiple injection regime of BENZO administration designed to maintain plasma concentrations for prolonged periods was, however, no more effective than a single dose. The response of the RIF-1 sarcoma to cyclophosphamide was not enhanced by the lipophilic sensitizers at the doses previously stated. Considerable enhancement of tumour response to melphalan (DMF 2.0) was produced by both lipophilic sensitizers. Enhancement of acute LD50 was similar in magnitude but no large enhancement by BENZO of melphalan induced white blood cell depression was observed. The evidence regarding the therapeutic potential of this combination is, therefore, equivocal. 1983-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2011422/ /pubmed/6871076 Text en
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Twentyman, P. R.
Workman, P.
spellingShingle Twentyman, P. R.
Workman, P.
Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.
author_facet Twentyman, P. R.
Workman, P.
author_sort Twentyman, P. R.
title Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.
title_short Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.
title_full Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.
title_fullStr Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.
title_full_unstemmed Chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.
title_sort chemosensitization by lipophilic nitroimidazoles.
description We have carried out experiments to determine the response of tumours and normal tissues in the C3H mouse to the combination of lipophilic nitroimidazoles and CCNU, cyclophosphamide or melphalan. The nitroimidazoles studied were Ro 07-1902 (1902) and benznidazole (Ro 07-1051, BENZO). Maximum enhancement of CCNU response in the KHT sarcoma by 2.5 mmol kg-1 1902 or 0.3 mmol kg-1 BENZO occurred at low doses of CCNU where dose modifying factors (DMF) of 2.5-3.0 and 1.5-2.0 respectively were found. The DMFs for depression of white cell count at day 3 were 1.6 and 1.2 respectively whilst the DMFs for LD50/30 were 1.5 and 1.3. There appears, therefore, to be a therapeutic gain at low doses of CCNU of about the same magnitude as produced by 2.5 mmol kg-1 misonidazole. The production of this gain at relatively low doses of BENZO is of possible clinical significance. Some sensitization of the KHT tumour to CCNU by 0.3 mmol kg-1 BENZO was maintained even with an interval of 25 h between BENZO and CCNU injection. A multiple injection regime of BENZO administration designed to maintain plasma concentrations for prolonged periods was, however, no more effective than a single dose. The response of the RIF-1 sarcoma to cyclophosphamide was not enhanced by the lipophilic sensitizers at the doses previously stated. Considerable enhancement of tumour response to melphalan (DMF 2.0) was produced by both lipophilic sensitizers. Enhancement of acute LD50 was similar in magnitude but no large enhancement by BENZO of melphalan induced white blood cell depression was observed. The evidence regarding the therapeutic potential of this combination is, therefore, equivocal.
publishDate 1983
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2011422/
_version_ 1611404106022256640