The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.

Nodal involvement is accepted as the best single marker of prognosis in breast cancer. However, there is little information on the sub-division of node-positive patients according to the oestrogen receptor status of the nodal tissue. We have previously reported (Eur. J. Ca. 1987, 23, 31) that, in al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Castagnetta, L., Traina, A., Carruba, G., Fecarotta, E., Palazzotto, G., Leake, R.
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: 1992
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977903/
id pubmed-1977903
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-19779032009-09-10 The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes. Castagnetta, L. Traina, A. Carruba, G. Fecarotta, E. Palazzotto, G. Leake, R. Research Article Nodal involvement is accepted as the best single marker of prognosis in breast cancer. However, there is little information on the sub-division of node-positive patients according to the oestrogen receptor status of the nodal tissue. We have previously reported (Eur. J. Ca. 1987, 23, 31) that, in almost all cases, involved nodes are only oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) in patients whose primary tumours are uniformly ER+. This paper presents clinical follow-up on a larger group of patients with node positive breast cancer. For each patient, both soluble and nuclear receptor concentrations were determined in three separate parts of the primary tumour and in at least one involved node (we have previously defined tumours which contained ER in all six fractions of the primary as HS++, those lacking receptor in some fractions as HS+- and wholly receptor negative tumours as HS--). Median follow-up time was 71.5 months. As expected, patients whose tumours were HS++ had a significant (P less than 0.008) survival advantage. More importantly, patients with ER in both the soluble and nuclear fractions of their involved nodes survived significantly (P less than 0.003) longer than those with ER- nodes. Thus, full oestrogen receptor status of involved nodes will give sufficient prognostic information when adequate primary tissue is not available. 1992-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1977903/ /pubmed/1637667 Text en
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Castagnetta, L.
Traina, A.
Carruba, G.
Fecarotta, E.
Palazzotto, G.
Leake, R.
spellingShingle Castagnetta, L.
Traina, A.
Carruba, G.
Fecarotta, E.
Palazzotto, G.
Leake, R.
The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.
author_facet Castagnetta, L.
Traina, A.
Carruba, G.
Fecarotta, E.
Palazzotto, G.
Leake, R.
author_sort Castagnetta, L.
title The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.
title_short The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.
title_full The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.
title_fullStr The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.
title_full_unstemmed The prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.
title_sort prognosis of breast cancer patients in relation to the oestrogen receptor status of both primary disease and involved nodes.
description Nodal involvement is accepted as the best single marker of prognosis in breast cancer. However, there is little information on the sub-division of node-positive patients according to the oestrogen receptor status of the nodal tissue. We have previously reported (Eur. J. Ca. 1987, 23, 31) that, in almost all cases, involved nodes are only oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) in patients whose primary tumours are uniformly ER+. This paper presents clinical follow-up on a larger group of patients with node positive breast cancer. For each patient, both soluble and nuclear receptor concentrations were determined in three separate parts of the primary tumour and in at least one involved node (we have previously defined tumours which contained ER in all six fractions of the primary as HS++, those lacking receptor in some fractions as HS+- and wholly receptor negative tumours as HS--). Median follow-up time was 71.5 months. As expected, patients whose tumours were HS++ had a significant (P less than 0.008) survival advantage. More importantly, patients with ER in both the soluble and nuclear fractions of their involved nodes survived significantly (P less than 0.003) longer than those with ER- nodes. Thus, full oestrogen receptor status of involved nodes will give sufficient prognostic information when adequate primary tissue is not available.
publishDate 1992
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1977903/
_version_ 1611401197629997056