How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure
The evaluation and use of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures requires detailed understanding of the meaning of the outcome of interest. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently presented its draft guidance and view on the use of PRO measures as endpoints in clinical trials. One section o...
Main Authors: | Brożek, Jan L, Guyatt, Gordon H, Schünemann, Holger J |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599713/ |
Similar Items
-
Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: The clinician's perspective
by: Schünemann, Holger J, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol
by: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – clinical management guided by the evidence-based GRADE approach: what arguments can be made against transparency in guideline development?
by: Rochwerg, Bram, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Food labelling: nutrition claims
by: David, Jukes
Published: (1999) -
Food labelling and health claims
Published: (2008)