Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Power Consumption in Machining FCD 450 Cast Iron using Coated and Uncoated Irregular Milling Tools
In this project, the effects of different cutting parameters on surface roughness and power consumption when machining FCD450 cast iron were studied using coated and uncoated irregular milling tool geometry of variable helix and pitch. Their responses on roughness and power consumption were evaluate...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Pahang
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10643/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10643/1/Evaluation%20of%20Surface%20Roughness%20and%20Power%20Consumption%20in%20Machining%20FCD%20450%20Cast%20Iron%20using%20Coated%20and%20Uncoated%20Irregular%20Milling%20Tools.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10643/7/Evaluation%20of%20Surface%20Roughness%20and%20Power%20Consumption%20in%20Machining%20FCD%20450%20Cast%20Iron%20using%20Coated%20and%20Uncoated%20Irregular%20Milling%20Tools-abstract.pdf |
| Summary: | In this project, the effects of different cutting parameters on surface roughness and power consumption when machining FCD450 cast iron were studied using coated and uncoated irregular milling tool geometry of variable helix and pitch. Their responses on roughness and power consumption were evaluated based on the spindle speed, feed rate, and depth of cut, machining length and machining time. Results showed that except spindle speed and machining length, other parameters such as feed rate, axial and radial depth of cut and also machining time proportionate with surface roughness. The power consumption proportionately increase for all cutting parameters except feedrate. It is showed that the average decrement 27.92 percent for surface roughness and average decrement 9.32 percent for power consumption by using coated compared to uncoated tool. Optimum cutting parameters for both minimum surface roughness and power consumption can be determined. The coated tools performed better than uncoated milling tools for responses of surface roughness and power consumption to increase machining productivity and profit. |
|---|