Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers

Background Oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM) is used clinically to optimize cardiac output (CO) and guide fluid therapy. Despite limited experimental evidence, it is assumed that increasing CO increases visceral microvascular blood flow (MBF). We used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heinink, Thomas P., Read, David J., Mitchell, William K., Bhalla, Ashish, Lund, Jonathan N., Phillips, Bethan E., Williams, John P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
Online Access:http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/1/Submitted%20manuscript%20to%20functional%20imaging%20July%202016.pdf
id nottingham-44523
recordtype eprints
spelling nottingham-445232018-02-06T14:29:18Z http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/ Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers Heinink, Thomas P. Read, David J. Mitchell, William K. Bhalla, Ashish Lund, Jonathan N. Phillips, Bethan E. Williams, John P. Background Oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM) is used clinically to optimize cardiac output (CO) and guide fluid therapy. Despite limited experimental evidence, it is assumed that increasing CO increases visceral microvascular blood flow (MBF). We used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to assess whether ODM-guided optimization of CO altered MBF. Methods Sixteen healthy male volunteers (62 ± 3·4 years) were studied. Baseline measurements of CO were recorded via ODM. Hepatic and renal MBF was assessed via CEUS. Saline 0·9% was administered to optimize CO according to a standard protocol and repeat CEUS performed. Time–intensity curves were constructed, allowing organ perfusion calculation via time to 5% perfusion (TT5). MBF was assessed via organ perfusion rise time (RT) (5–95%). Results CO increased (4535 ± 241 ml/min versus 5442 ± 329 ml/min, P<0·0001) following fluid administration, whilst time to renal (22·48 ± 1·19 s versus 20·79 ± 1·31 s; P = 0·03), but not hepatic (28·13 ± 4·48 s versus 26·83 ± 1·53 s; P = 0·15) perfusion decreased. Time to renal perfusion was related to CO (renal: r = −0·43, P = 0·01). Hepatic nor renal RT altered following fluid administration (renal: 9·03 ± 0·86 versus 8·93 ± 0·85 s P = 0·86; hepatic: 27·86 ± 1·60 s versus 30·71 ± 2·19 s, P = 0·13). No relationship was observed between changes in CO and MBF in either organ (renal: r = −0·17, P = 0·54; hepatic: r = −0·07, P = 0·80). Conclusions ODM-optimized CO reduces time to renal perfusion but does not alter renal or hepatic MBF. A lack of relationship between microvascular visceral perfusion and CO following ODM-guided optimization may explain the absence of improved clinical outcome with ODM monitoring. Wiley 2017-02-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/1/Submitted%20manuscript%20to%20functional%20imaging%20July%202016.pdf Heinink, Thomas P. and Read, David J. and Mitchell, William K. and Bhalla, Ashish and Lund, Jonathan N. and Phillips, Bethan E. and Williams, John P. (2017) Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging . ISSN 1475-097X http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12401/abstract doi:10.1111/cpf.12401 doi:10.1111/cpf.12401
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
language English
description Background Oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM) is used clinically to optimize cardiac output (CO) and guide fluid therapy. Despite limited experimental evidence, it is assumed that increasing CO increases visceral microvascular blood flow (MBF). We used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to assess whether ODM-guided optimization of CO altered MBF. Methods Sixteen healthy male volunteers (62 ± 3·4 years) were studied. Baseline measurements of CO were recorded via ODM. Hepatic and renal MBF was assessed via CEUS. Saline 0·9% was administered to optimize CO according to a standard protocol and repeat CEUS performed. Time–intensity curves were constructed, allowing organ perfusion calculation via time to 5% perfusion (TT5). MBF was assessed via organ perfusion rise time (RT) (5–95%). Results CO increased (4535 ± 241 ml/min versus 5442 ± 329 ml/min, P<0·0001) following fluid administration, whilst time to renal (22·48 ± 1·19 s versus 20·79 ± 1·31 s; P = 0·03), but not hepatic (28·13 ± 4·48 s versus 26·83 ± 1·53 s; P = 0·15) perfusion decreased. Time to renal perfusion was related to CO (renal: r = −0·43, P = 0·01). Hepatic nor renal RT altered following fluid administration (renal: 9·03 ± 0·86 versus 8·93 ± 0·85 s P = 0·86; hepatic: 27·86 ± 1·60 s versus 30·71 ± 2·19 s, P = 0·13). No relationship was observed between changes in CO and MBF in either organ (renal: r = −0·17, P = 0·54; hepatic: r = −0·07, P = 0·80). Conclusions ODM-optimized CO reduces time to renal perfusion but does not alter renal or hepatic MBF. A lack of relationship between microvascular visceral perfusion and CO following ODM-guided optimization may explain the absence of improved clinical outcome with ODM monitoring.
format Article
author Heinink, Thomas P.
Read, David J.
Mitchell, William K.
Bhalla, Ashish
Lund, Jonathan N.
Phillips, Bethan E.
Williams, John P.
spellingShingle Heinink, Thomas P.
Read, David J.
Mitchell, William K.
Bhalla, Ashish
Lund, Jonathan N.
Phillips, Bethan E.
Williams, John P.
Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers
author_facet Heinink, Thomas P.
Read, David J.
Mitchell, William K.
Bhalla, Ashish
Lund, Jonathan N.
Phillips, Bethan E.
Williams, John P.
author_sort Heinink, Thomas P.
title Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers
title_short Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers
title_full Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Oesophageal Doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers
title_sort oesophageal doppler guided optimization of cardiac output does not increase visceral microvascular blood flow in healthy volunteers
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2017
url http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/
http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44523/1/Submitted%20manuscript%20to%20functional%20imaging%20July%202016.pdf
first_indexed 2018-09-06T13:34:11Z
last_indexed 2018-09-06T13:34:11Z
_version_ 1610865287598440448