O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants

O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants

A Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a tool that can be used to map and measure the relationship between researchers. Overall, the current research only describes and does not explain relationships between accoun-ting researchers. The aim of this paper is to propose a model with three dimensions to an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego Bevilacqua Meli, José Dutra de Oliveira Neto
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2011-01-01
Series:Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76220775008
id doaj-art-75f0cc29c8624651a5e3a3ce5306704b
recordtype oai_dc
spelling doaj-art-75f0cc29c8624651a5e3a3ce5306704b2018-09-12T22:34:33ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaRevista Contemporânea de Contabilidade1807-18212175-80692011-01-01815151176O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuantsDiego Bevilacqua MeliJosé Dutra de Oliveira NetoA Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a tool that can be used to map and measure the relationship between researchers. Overall, the current research only describes and does not explain relationships between accoun-ting researchers. The aim of this paper is to propose a model with three dimensions to analyze and explain the pro¿ le of scientific collaboration between accounting researchers in Brazil. The sample consisted of seven journals, 939 authors and 580 articles between 2005 and 2009. The results show that the network is fragmented and there is a major component isolated comprising 48.03% of the authors and their knowledge is partially shared. Most of the researchers were categorized as one-timers (71%) - which published only once in the period and only 2.45% were continuants the guiding accounting researchers. We conclude that the proposed model may help to explain the collaboration between researchers. Using this model, institutions can develop innovative strategies to improve collaboration among researchers.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76220775008
institution Open Data Bank
collection Open Access Journals
building Directory of Open Access Journals
language Portuguese
format Article
author Diego Bevilacqua Meli
José Dutra de Oliveira Neto
spellingShingle Diego Bevilacqua Meli
José Dutra de Oliveira Neto
O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants
Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade
author_facet Diego Bevilacqua Meli
José Dutra de Oliveira Neto
author_sort Diego Bevilacqua Meli
title O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants
title_short O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants
title_full O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants
title_fullStr O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants
title_full_unstemmed O perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants
title_sort o perfi l da colaboração nos periódicos contábeis nacionais: muitos one-timers e poucos continuants
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade
issn 1807-1821
2175-8069
publishDate 2011-01-01
description A Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a tool that can be used to map and measure the relationship between researchers. Overall, the current research only describes and does not explain relationships between accoun-ting researchers. The aim of this paper is to propose a model with three dimensions to analyze and explain the pro¿ le of scientific collaboration between accounting researchers in Brazil. The sample consisted of seven journals, 939 authors and 580 articles between 2005 and 2009. The results show that the network is fragmented and there is a major component isolated comprising 48.03% of the authors and their knowledge is partially shared. Most of the researchers were categorized as one-timers (71%) - which published only once in the period and only 2.45% were continuants the guiding accounting researchers. We conclude that the proposed model may help to explain the collaboration between researchers. Using this model, institutions can develop innovative strategies to improve collaboration among researchers.
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76220775008
_version_ 1612590836397113344

Similar Items