Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopically guided lumbar punctures (FGLP) using “pulsed fluoroscopy in a low dose mode” compared with the commonly used “continuous fluoroscopy in a standard dose mode” while maintaining the technical success. Mater...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Imaging Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/article.asp?issn=2156-7514;year=2018;volume=8;issue=1;spage=9;epage=9;aulast=Sabat |
id |
doaj-art-75999b43bf384a86ae3202285d04a3b1 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
doaj-art-75999b43bf384a86ae3202285d04a3b12018-09-17T09:49:11ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Clinical Imaging Science2156-75142156-55972018-01-01819910.4103/jcis.JCIS_94_17Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled studyShyam SabatEinat SlonimskyPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopically guided lumbar punctures (FGLP) using “pulsed fluoroscopy in a low dose mode” compared with the commonly used “continuous fluoroscopy in a standard dose mode” while maintaining the technical success. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent FGLP divided randomly to seventeen patients in the control group with standard dose continuous FGLP and eighteen patients in the study group with low-dose low-frame-rate of 3 frames per second (fps) FGLP. Entrance surface dose measurements from a dosimeter device were recorded as well as the dose area product (DAP). Results: A total of 35 patients with average age of 52 years (range: 15–87 [±17 standard deviation [SD]) were evaluated. Average entrance surface dose of the study group was significantly lower (3.81 mGy [range: 0.21–11.14, [±2.8 SD]) compared with the control group (22.45 mGy [range: 1.23–73.44, [±19.41 [SD]). The average DAP of the study group (10 mGy·cm2 [range: 1–41, [±9.8 SD]) was also significantly lower than the control group (65 mGy·cm2 [range: 5–199, [±53 SD]). Success rate was similar between the study and control groups. Conclusion: Low dose pulsed fluoroscopy of 3 fps significantly reduces radiation exposure by about 600% compared with standard dose continuous fluoroscopy in FGLP. Utilizing this radiation saving strategy will allow to dramatically reduce radiation exposure, without impacting the technical success rate.http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/article.asp?issn=2156-7514;year=2018;volume=8;issue=1;spage=9;epage=9;aulast=SabatFluoroscopylumbar punctureradiation |
institution |
Open Data Bank |
collection |
Open Access Journals |
building |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
author |
Shyam Sabat Einat Slonimsky |
spellingShingle |
Shyam Sabat Einat Slonimsky Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Fluoroscopy lumbar puncture radiation |
author_facet |
Shyam Sabat Einat Slonimsky |
author_sort |
Shyam Sabat |
title |
Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study |
title_short |
Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study |
title_full |
Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study |
title_fullStr |
Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study |
title_sort |
radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: a prospective controlled study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science |
issn |
2156-7514 2156-5597 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopically guided lumbar punctures (FGLP) using “pulsed fluoroscopy in a low dose mode” compared with the commonly used “continuous fluoroscopy in a standard dose mode” while maintaining the technical success. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent FGLP divided randomly to seventeen patients in the control group with standard dose continuous FGLP and eighteen patients in the study group with low-dose low-frame-rate of 3 frames per second (fps) FGLP. Entrance surface dose measurements from a dosimeter device were recorded as well as the dose area product (DAP). Results: A total of 35 patients with average age of 52 years (range: 15–87 [±17 standard deviation [SD]) were evaluated. Average entrance surface dose of the study group was significantly lower (3.81 mGy [range: 0.21–11.14, [±2.8 SD]) compared with the control group (22.45 mGy [range: 1.23–73.44, [±19.41 [SD]). The average DAP of the study group (10 mGy·cm2 [range: 1–41, [±9.8 SD]) was also significantly lower than the control group (65 mGy·cm2 [range: 5–199, [±53 SD]). Success rate was similar between the study and control groups. Conclusion: Low dose pulsed fluoroscopy of 3 fps significantly reduces radiation exposure by about 600% compared with standard dose continuous fluoroscopy in FGLP. Utilizing this radiation saving strategy will allow to dramatically reduce radiation exposure, without impacting the technical success rate. |
topic |
Fluoroscopy lumbar puncture radiation |
url |
http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/article.asp?issn=2156-7514;year=2018;volume=8;issue=1;spage=9;epage=9;aulast=Sabat |
_version_ |
1612555685862572032 |