Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopically guided lumbar punctures (FGLP) using “pulsed fluoroscopy in a low dose mode” compared with the commonly used “continuous fluoroscopy in a standard dose mode” while maintaining the technical success. Mater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shyam Sabat, Einat Slonimsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/article.asp?issn=2156-7514;year=2018;volume=8;issue=1;spage=9;epage=9;aulast=Sabat
id doaj-art-75999b43bf384a86ae3202285d04a3b1
recordtype oai_dc
spelling doaj-art-75999b43bf384a86ae3202285d04a3b12018-09-17T09:49:11ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Clinical Imaging Science2156-75142156-55972018-01-01819910.4103/jcis.JCIS_94_17Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled studyShyam SabatEinat SlonimskyPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopically guided lumbar punctures (FGLP) using “pulsed fluoroscopy in a low dose mode” compared with the commonly used “continuous fluoroscopy in a standard dose mode” while maintaining the technical success. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent FGLP divided randomly to seventeen patients in the control group with standard dose continuous FGLP and eighteen patients in the study group with low-dose low-frame-rate of 3 frames per second (fps) FGLP. Entrance surface dose measurements from a dosimeter device were recorded as well as the dose area product (DAP). Results: A total of 35 patients with average age of 52 years (range: 15–87 [±17 standard deviation [SD]) were evaluated. Average entrance surface dose of the study group was significantly lower (3.81 mGy [range: 0.21–11.14, [±2.8 SD]) compared with the control group (22.45 mGy [range: 1.23–73.44, [±19.41 [SD]). The average DAP of the study group (10 mGy·cm2 [range: 1–41, [±9.8 SD]) was also significantly lower than the control group (65 mGy·cm2 [range: 5–199, [±53 SD]). Success rate was similar between the study and control groups. Conclusion: Low dose pulsed fluoroscopy of 3 fps significantly reduces radiation exposure by about 600% compared with standard dose continuous fluoroscopy in FGLP. Utilizing this radiation saving strategy will allow to dramatically reduce radiation exposure, without impacting the technical success rate.http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/article.asp?issn=2156-7514;year=2018;volume=8;issue=1;spage=9;epage=9;aulast=SabatFluoroscopylumbar punctureradiation
institution Open Data Bank
collection Open Access Journals
building Directory of Open Access Journals
language English
format Article
author Shyam Sabat
Einat Slonimsky
spellingShingle Shyam Sabat
Einat Slonimsky
Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Fluoroscopy
lumbar puncture
radiation
author_facet Shyam Sabat
Einat Slonimsky
author_sort Shyam Sabat
title Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study
title_short Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study
title_full Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study
title_fullStr Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: A prospective controlled study
title_sort radiation reduction in low dose pulsed fluoroscopy versus standard dose continuous fluoroscopy during fluoroscopically-guided lumbar punctures: a prospective controlled study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
issn 2156-7514
2156-5597
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopically guided lumbar punctures (FGLP) using “pulsed fluoroscopy in a low dose mode” compared with the commonly used “continuous fluoroscopy in a standard dose mode” while maintaining the technical success. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent FGLP divided randomly to seventeen patients in the control group with standard dose continuous FGLP and eighteen patients in the study group with low-dose low-frame-rate of 3 frames per second (fps) FGLP. Entrance surface dose measurements from a dosimeter device were recorded as well as the dose area product (DAP). Results: A total of 35 patients with average age of 52 years (range: 15–87 [±17 standard deviation [SD]) were evaluated. Average entrance surface dose of the study group was significantly lower (3.81 mGy [range: 0.21–11.14, [±2.8 SD]) compared with the control group (22.45 mGy [range: 1.23–73.44, [±19.41 [SD]). The average DAP of the study group (10 mGy·cm2 [range: 1–41, [±9.8 SD]) was also significantly lower than the control group (65 mGy·cm2 [range: 5–199, [±53 SD]). Success rate was similar between the study and control groups. Conclusion: Low dose pulsed fluoroscopy of 3 fps significantly reduces radiation exposure by about 600% compared with standard dose continuous fluoroscopy in FGLP. Utilizing this radiation saving strategy will allow to dramatically reduce radiation exposure, without impacting the technical success rate.
topic Fluoroscopy
lumbar puncture
radiation
url http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/article.asp?issn=2156-7514;year=2018;volume=8;issue=1;spage=9;epage=9;aulast=Sabat
_version_ 1612555685862572032