Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator Installed

The objective of studys is to evaluate the differences of CPIS in applying CSS and OSS with oral hygiene chlorhexidine in critical patients with ventilators. In two hospitals in Semarang for two months. There were 30 subjects recruited by purposive sampling and divided in two groups equally (n=15)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Supriandi Supriandi, Mardiyono Mardiyono, Made Desak Wenten Parwati
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: UPPM, Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang 2015-07-01
Series:Jurnal Riset Kesehatan
Subjects:
VAP
Online Access:http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jrk/article/view/126
id doaj-art-48c37989a7154b6badc2ed323eeb49df
recordtype oai_dc
spelling doaj-art-48c37989a7154b6badc2ed323eeb49df2018-09-03T09:46:41ZindUPPM, Poltekkes Kemenkes SemarangJurnal Riset Kesehatan2252-50682461-10262015-07-013360260710.31983/jrk.v3i3.126111Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator InstalledSupriandi Supriandi0Mardiyono Mardiyono1Made Desak Wenten Parwati2Jurusan Keperawatan Poltekkes Kemenkes PalangkarayaNursing Department, Polytechnic Health Ministry of SemarangNursing Department, Polytechnic Health Ministry of SemarangThe objective of studys is to evaluate the differences of CPIS in applying CSS and OSS with oral hygiene chlorhexidine in critical patients with ventilators. In two hospitals in Semarang for two months. There were 30 subjects recruited by purposive sampling and divided in two groups equally (n=15). VAP was measured by CPIS on the third day after invasion. The interventions are OSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine twice a day and CSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine once a day during inserted ventilators. CPIS in the two groups were no significant difference. The OSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine twice a day was similarly effective to the CSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine once a day to prevent VAP in critical patients with ventilator (U=105; p=0,766). The application of the OSS with oral hygiene with clorhexidine twice a day is instead of the CSS with oral hygiene with clorhexidine once a day, which is more expensive to prevent VAP. Since there is no difference of CPIS in patients with OSS and CSS, at is recommended the use of SCC due to its lower cost compered to CSS method.http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jrk/article/view/126Open suction systemclosed suction systemoral hygieneCPISVAP
institution Open Data Bank
collection Open Access Journals
building Directory of Open Access Journals
language Indonesian
format Article
author Supriandi Supriandi
Mardiyono Mardiyono
Made Desak Wenten Parwati
spellingShingle Supriandi Supriandi
Mardiyono Mardiyono
Made Desak Wenten Parwati
Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator Installed
Jurnal Riset Kesehatan
Open suction system
closed suction system
oral hygiene
CPIS
VAP
author_facet Supriandi Supriandi
Mardiyono Mardiyono
Made Desak Wenten Parwati
author_sort Supriandi Supriandi
title Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator Installed
title_short Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator Installed
title_full Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator Installed
title_fullStr Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator Installed
title_full_unstemmed Open and Closed Suction Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention of Patient On Ventilator Installed
title_sort open and closed suction ventilator associated pneumonia prevention of patient on ventilator installed
publisher UPPM, Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang
series Jurnal Riset Kesehatan
issn 2252-5068
2461-1026
publishDate 2015-07-01
description The objective of studys is to evaluate the differences of CPIS in applying CSS and OSS with oral hygiene chlorhexidine in critical patients with ventilators. In two hospitals in Semarang for two months. There were 30 subjects recruited by purposive sampling and divided in two groups equally (n=15). VAP was measured by CPIS on the third day after invasion. The interventions are OSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine twice a day and CSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine once a day during inserted ventilators. CPIS in the two groups were no significant difference. The OSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine twice a day was similarly effective to the CSS and oral hygiene with clorhexidine once a day to prevent VAP in critical patients with ventilator (U=105; p=0,766). The application of the OSS with oral hygiene with clorhexidine twice a day is instead of the CSS with oral hygiene with clorhexidine once a day, which is more expensive to prevent VAP. Since there is no difference of CPIS in patients with OSS and CSS, at is recommended the use of SCC due to its lower cost compered to CSS method.
topic Open suction system
closed suction system
oral hygiene
CPIS
VAP
url http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jrk/article/view/126
_version_ 1612620539616034816