Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.

University scientists conducting research on topics of potential health concern often want to partner with a range of actors, including government entities, non-governmental organizations, and private enterprises. Such partnerships can provide access to needed resources, including funding. However,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John C Besley, Aaron M McCright, Nagwan R Zahry, Kevin C Elliott, Norbert E Kaminski, Joseph D Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398532?pdf=render
id doaj-art-38cf77006a1a4c91b26bbbacfb28a93b
recordtype oai_dc
spelling doaj-art-38cf77006a1a4c91b26bbbacfb28a93b2018-08-23T04:44:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-6203124e017564310.1371/journal.pone.0175643Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.John C BesleyAaron M McCrightNagwan R ZahryKevin C ElliottNorbert E KaminskiJoseph D MartinUniversity scientists conducting research on topics of potential health concern often want to partner with a range of actors, including government entities, non-governmental organizations, and private enterprises. Such partnerships can provide access to needed resources, including funding. However, those who observe the results of such partnerships may judge those results based on who is involved. This set of studies seeks to assess how people perceive two hypothetical health science research collaborations. In doing so, it also tests the utility of using procedural justice concepts to assess perceptions of research legitimacy as a theoretical way to investigate conflict of interest perceptions. Findings show that including an industry collaborator has clear negative repercussions for how people see a research partnership and that these perceptions shape people's willingness to see the research as a legitimate source of knowledge. Additional research aimed at further communicating procedures that might mitigate the impact of industry collaboration is suggested.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398532?pdf=render
institution Open Data Bank
collection Open Access Journals
building Directory of Open Access Journals
language English
format Article
author John C Besley
Aaron M McCright
Nagwan R Zahry
Kevin C Elliott
Norbert E Kaminski
Joseph D Martin
spellingShingle John C Besley
Aaron M McCright
Nagwan R Zahry
Kevin C Elliott
Norbert E Kaminski
Joseph D Martin
Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.
PLoS ONE
author_facet John C Besley
Aaron M McCright
Nagwan R Zahry
Kevin C Elliott
Norbert E Kaminski
Joseph D Martin
author_sort John C Besley
title Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.
title_short Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.
title_full Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.
title_fullStr Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.
title_full_unstemmed Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.
title_sort perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
description University scientists conducting research on topics of potential health concern often want to partner with a range of actors, including government entities, non-governmental organizations, and private enterprises. Such partnerships can provide access to needed resources, including funding. However, those who observe the results of such partnerships may judge those results based on who is involved. This set of studies seeks to assess how people perceive two hypothetical health science research collaborations. In doing so, it also tests the utility of using procedural justice concepts to assess perceptions of research legitimacy as a theoretical way to investigate conflict of interest perceptions. Findings show that including an industry collaborator has clear negative repercussions for how people see a research partnership and that these perceptions shape people's willingness to see the research as a legitimate source of knowledge. Additional research aimed at further communicating procedures that might mitigate the impact of industry collaboration is suggested.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5398532?pdf=render
_version_ 1612675289011191808