Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation

Assesing pain in mechanically ventilated patients is a great challenge. Mechanical ventilated patients are often unable to self-report the presence of pain. CPOT is a behavioral pain scale which has been developed and validated for measuring pain in nonverbal critically ill adults. Purpose: This stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Arsyawina Arsyawina, Mardiyono Mardiyono, Sarkum Sarkum
Format:	Article
Language:	Indonesian
Published:	UPPM, Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang 2015-08-01
Series:	Jurnal Riset Kesehatan
Subjects:	CPOT Wong-Baker Pain Mechanical ventilation
Online Access:	http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jrk/article/view/240

id	doaj-art-180e30cd12af4dbfaffac821fdc45ddf
recordtype	oai_dc
spelling	doaj-art-180e30cd12af4dbfaffac821fdc45ddf2018-09-03T09:46:50ZindUPPM, Poltekkes Kemenkes SemarangJurnal Riset Kesehatan2252-50682461-10262015-08-013150751310.31983/jrk.v3i1.240209Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical VentilationArsyawina Arsyawina0Mardiyono Mardiyono1Sarkum Sarkum2Jurusan Keperawatan Poltekkes Kemenkes Kalimantan TimurNursing Department, Polytechnic Health Ministry of SemarangNursing Department, Polytechnic Health Ministry of SemarangAssesing pain in mechanically ventilated patients is a great challenge. Mechanical ventilated patients are often unable to self-report the presence of pain. CPOT is a behavioral pain scale which has been developed and validated for measuring pain in nonverbal critically ill adults. Purpose: This study was to compare CPOT and Wong-Baker by examining psychometric properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness. Method : A repeated measures design was chosen for this quantitative study with 31 samples of mechanically ventilated patients. Result : The ICC values of inter-rater reliability were high at 0,965 for CPOT and low at 0,423 for Wong-Baker. Validity was demonstrated by the change in CPOT and Wong-Baker, which were significantly higher during painful procedures,with averages for CPOT 1,32 – 1,42 at rest and 2,39-4,26 during procedure (p <0,001) and for Wong-Baker 4,52 – 4,65 at rest and 5,29-5,74 during procedure. The CPOT exhibited excellent responsiveness, with an effect size ranging from 5,0 to 5,4 better then Wong-Baker with an effect size ranging from 0,8 to 2,2. Conclusion : This study demonstrated that the CPOT can be valid, reliabeland more responsiveness for measuring pain in mechanical ventilated patients.http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jrk/article/view/240CPOTWong-BakerPainMechanical ventilation
institution	Open Data Bank
collection	Open Access Journals
building	Directory of Open Access Journals
language	Indonesian
format	Article
author	Arsyawina Arsyawina Mardiyono Mardiyono Sarkum Sarkum
spellingShingle	Arsyawina Arsyawina Mardiyono Mardiyono Sarkum Sarkum Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation Jurnal Riset Kesehatan CPOT Wong-Baker Pain Mechanical ventilation
author_facet	Arsyawina Arsyawina Mardiyono Mardiyono Sarkum Sarkum
author_sort	Arsyawina Arsyawina
title	Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation
title_short	Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation
title_full	Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation
title_fullStr	Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation
title_full_unstemmed	Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation
title_sort	critical-care pain observation tool (cpot) and wong-baker faces pain rating scale in measuring pain level of patient with mechanical ventilation
publisher	UPPM, Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang
series	Jurnal Riset Kesehatan
issn	2252-5068 2461-1026
publishDate	2015-08-01
description	Assesing pain in mechanically ventilated patients is a great challenge. Mechanical ventilated patients are often unable to self-report the presence of pain. CPOT is a behavioral pain scale which has been developed and validated for measuring pain in nonverbal critically ill adults. Purpose: This study was to compare CPOT and Wong-Baker by examining psychometric properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness. Method : A repeated measures design was chosen for this quantitative study with 31 samples of mechanically ventilated patients. Result : The ICC values of inter-rater reliability were high at 0,965 for CPOT and low at 0,423 for Wong-Baker. Validity was demonstrated by the change in CPOT and Wong-Baker, which were significantly higher during painful procedures,with averages for CPOT 1,32 – 1,42 at rest and 2,39-4,26 during procedure (p <0,001) and for Wong-Baker 4,52 – 4,65 at rest and 5,29-5,74 during procedure. The CPOT exhibited excellent responsiveness, with an effect size ranging from 5,0 to 5,4 better then Wong-Baker with an effect size ranging from 0,8 to 2,2. Conclusion : This study demonstrated that the CPOT can be valid, reliabeland more responsiveness for measuring pain in mechanical ventilated patients.
topic	CPOT Wong-Baker Pain Mechanical ventilation
url	http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jrk/article/view/240
_version_	1612620515662364672

Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Level of Patient With Mechanical Ventilation

Similar Items