How wars are won and lost [ vulnerability and military power

Military power is a key component of state power. Yet for all the attention statesmen, soldiers, and scholars give to military power, it remains a loose concept. A considerable academic effort has catalogued characteristics of great power wars. Scholars know much about individual wars, and they unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gentry, John A. , 1949- (Author)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Published: Santa Barbara, California : Praeger , c2012
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 7i4500
001 0000086083
005 20140408093000.0
008 140105s2012 cau eng
020 |a 0313395829 
020 |a 0313395837 (e-book) 
020 |a 9780313395826 
020 |a 9780313395833 (e-book) 
050 0 0 |a U162   |b .G46 2012 
090 0 0 |a U162   |b .G46 2012 
100 1 |a Gentry, John A. ,   |d 1949- ,   |e author 
245 1 0 |a How wars are won and lost [  |h [electronic resource]] :   |b vulnerability and military power   |c John A. Gentry 
260 |a Santa Barbara, California :   |b Praeger ,   |c c2012 
300 |a 1 online resource (314 p.) :   |b ill 
500 |a Title from title screen (viewed on October 24, 2011) 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (p. [283]-306) and index 
505 0 |a 1.Introduction -- 2. The Philippine war of 1899-1902 -- 3. The Allied bomber offensive against Germany (1943-1945) -- 4. The United States in Vietnam (1961-1975) -- 5. NATO's war against Yugoslavia (1999) -- 6. The U.S. war in Iraq (2003-2011) -- 7. The U.S. war in Afghanistan (2001-?) -- 8. Summary and conclusions 
520 |a Military power is a key component of state power. Yet for all the attention statesmen, soldiers, and scholars give to military power, it remains a loose concept. A considerable academic effort has catalogued characteristics of great power wars. Scholars know much about individual wars, and they understand general patterns of war. But prominent theories of military power as a determinant of strategic political/military outcomes remain crude. The purpose of this book is to present, illustrate, and test an alternative general theory of military power defined as an ability to consistently, favorably influence strategic military outcomes -- that is, how and why actors win and lose wars. It also aims to use the theory to help explain why the United States has done very well in some of its military operations but very poorly in others. 
650 0 |a Military art and science   |z United States 
650 0 |a Strategic culture   |z United States 
650 0 |a Strategy 
651 0 |a United States   |x History, Military   |y 20th century 
651 0 |a United States   |x History, Military   |y 21th century 
856 4 0 |3 http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzQxNTgzMl9fQU41?sid=c5f56786-09ba-4755-8b03-1de43d9d465d@sessionmgr111&vid=9&format=EB&rid=1 
999 |a 1000160512   |b Electronic Resource   |c Electronic Resource   |e Gong Badak Campus