Detention in the 'War on Terror' : can human rights fight back?

"Fiona de Londras presents an overview of counter-terrorist detention in the US and the UK and the attempts by both states to achieve a downward recalibration of international human rights standards as they apply in an emergency. Arguing that the design and implementation of this policy has bee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Londras, Fiona (Author)
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , c2011
Subjects:
Online Access:Cover image

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 7i4500
001 0000079882
005 20130710093000.0
008 110322s2011 enk eng
020 |a 0521197600 (hardback : alk. paper) 
020 |a 9780521197601 (hardback : alk. paper) 
050 0 0 |a d48 K3240   |b .D45 2011 
090 0 0 |a d48 K3240   |b .D45 2011 
100 1 |a De Londras, Fiona ,   |e author 
245 1 0 |a Detention in the 'War on Terror' :   |b can human rights fight back?   |c Fiona de Londras 
260 |a Cambridge :   |b Cambridge University Press ,   |c c2011 
300 |a x, 316 p. :   |b ill. ;   |c 24 cm. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 284-302) and index 
505 0 |a 1. Introduction -- 2. Panic, fear and counter-terrorist law-making -- 3. The right to be free from arbitrary detention -- 4.Counter-terrorist detention : the executive approach -- 5.Legislating for counter-terrorist detention -- 6. International human rights law's resilience in the face of panic -- 7. Judicial responses to counter-terrorist detention : rights-based resistance -- 8. Conclusion 
520 |a "Fiona de Londras presents an overview of counter-terrorist detention in the US and the UK and the attempts by both states to achieve a downward recalibration of international human rights standards as they apply in an emergency. Arguing that the design and implementation of this policy has been greatly influenced by both popular and manufactured panic, Detention in the 'War on Terror' addresses counter-terrorist detention through an original analytic framework. In contrast to domestic law in the US and UK, de Londras argues that international human rights law has generally resisted the challenge to the right to be free from arbitrary detention, largely because of its relative insulation from counter-terrorist panic. She argues that this resilience gradually emboldened superior courts in the US and UK to resist repressive detention laws and policies and insist upon greater rights-protection for suspected terrorists" 
650 0 |a Detention of persons 
650 0 |a Human rights   |x International cooperation 
650 0 |a Terrorism   |x Prevention   |x Law and legislation 
856 4 2 |3 Cover image   |u http://assets.cambridge.org/97805211/97601/cover/9780521197601.jpg 
999 |a 1000150350   |b Book   |c OPEN SHELF (30 DAYS)   |e Gong Badak Campus