The performance of monetary policy : a comparison between civil-law and common-law countries

The objective of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of monetary policy between civillaw countries and common-law countries by investigating the impulse response of monetary policy actions on the level of output. This is to determine whether countries of common-law origin are less sensitive t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zakaria, Zukarnain
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Faculty of Management and Human Resource Developemant 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/8137/
http://eprints.utm.my/8137/1/ZukarnainZakaria2007_ThePerformanceofMonetaryPolicy.pdf
http://eprints.utm.my/8137/2/24-bil-09-jun-2007.html
Description
Summary:The objective of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of monetary policy between civillaw countries and common-law countries by investigating the impulse response of monetary policy actions on the level of output. This is to determine whether countries of common-law origin are less sensitive to monetary policy actions compared with civil-law countries. Theoretically, we expected that monetary policy is more effective in civil-law countries where their financial structures are more bank-based as compared to common-law countries where their financial structures are more market-based. The impulse response functions were generated through the estimation of first-differences VAR consisting of five variables. The findings show the impact of monetary policy is relatively stronger, responds more quickly and long lasting in civil-law countries compared with common-law countries.