Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant
Nonionic surfactants are always good candidates for surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR), enhanced oil recover (EOR) and insitu/ex-situ soil washing. Their wide application is based on their high solubilization capacities and their low bio-toxicity. However, surfactant loss due to adsorpti...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Canadian Center of Science and Education
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/6744/ http://eprints.utm.my/6744/4/MazenAhmedMuherei2008_MixingEffectofAnionicandNonionicSurfactants.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848891339844878336 |
|---|---|
| author | Ahmed Muherei, Mazen Junin, Radzuan |
| author_facet | Ahmed Muherei, Mazen Junin, Radzuan |
| author_sort | Ahmed Muherei, Mazen |
| building | UTeM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Nonionic surfactants are always good candidates for surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR), enhanced oil recover (EOR) and insitu/ex-situ soil washing. Their wide application is based on their high solubilization capacities and their low bio-toxicity. However, surfactant loss due to adsorption and/or partitioning on adsorbents impairs their effectiveness to solubilize/mobilize and reduce the oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) which renders contaminant remediation process economically unfeasible. In this research anionic (SDS) and nonionic (TX100) surfactants and their mixtures (1:2, 1:1, 2:1; TX100:SDS mass ratios) were evaluated for their ability to reduce surfactant CMCs, partitioning losses to an organic phase and/or adsorption to shale. Result showed that all mixtures behave similarly and have superior properties than both single surfactants. Partitioning and adsorption of TX100 into organic phase (Sarapar147) and shale were decreased by mixing with anionic surfactant (SDS). The data showed a 40% reduction in surfactant losses due to adsorption to shale and around 60% reduction due to both partitioning and adsorption. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T20:56:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | utm-6744 |
| institution | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T20:56:24Z |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publisher | Canadian Center of Science and Education |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | utm-67442017-02-21T07:08:43Z http://eprints.utm.my/6744/ Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant Ahmed Muherei, Mazen Junin, Radzuan TP Chemical technology Nonionic surfactants are always good candidates for surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR), enhanced oil recover (EOR) and insitu/ex-situ soil washing. Their wide application is based on their high solubilization capacities and their low bio-toxicity. However, surfactant loss due to adsorption and/or partitioning on adsorbents impairs their effectiveness to solubilize/mobilize and reduce the oil–water interfacial tension (IFT) which renders contaminant remediation process economically unfeasible. In this research anionic (SDS) and nonionic (TX100) surfactants and their mixtures (1:2, 1:1, 2:1; TX100:SDS mass ratios) were evaluated for their ability to reduce surfactant CMCs, partitioning losses to an organic phase and/or adsorption to shale. Result showed that all mixtures behave similarly and have superior properties than both single surfactants. Partitioning and adsorption of TX100 into organic phase (Sarapar147) and shale were decreased by mixing with anionic surfactant (SDS). The data showed a 40% reduction in surfactant losses due to adsorption to shale and around 60% reduction due to both partitioning and adsorption. Canadian Center of Science and Education 2008-05 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/6744/4/MazenAhmedMuherei2008_MixingEffectofAnionicandNonionicSurfactants.pdf Ahmed Muherei, Mazen and Junin, Radzuan (2008) Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant. Modern applied science, 2 (3). http://www.ccsenet.org/journal.html |
| spellingShingle | TP Chemical technology Ahmed Muherei, Mazen Junin, Radzuan Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant |
| title | Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant |
| title_full | Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant |
| title_fullStr | Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant |
| title_short | Mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant |
| title_sort | mixing effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on micellization, adsorption and partitioning of nonionic surfactant |
| topic | TP Chemical technology |
| url | http://eprints.utm.my/6744/ http://eprints.utm.my/6744/ http://eprints.utm.my/6744/4/MazenAhmedMuherei2008_MixingEffectofAnionicandNonionicSurfactants.pdf |