Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students
Educators Ishould Ibe Iconsidered Ithe Ilearning Istyle Iof Istudents Iso Ithat Ithe Ibest Ipractice Iapproach Ican Ibe Iapplied Iin Ilearning Iactivities. IAs Istudents Iunderstand Itheir Ilearning Istyle, Ithey Iwill Ibe Iable Ito Iintegrate Iit Iinto Itheir Ilearning Iprocess. IKolb ILearning ISt...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/ http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/1/J12880_84c814756d82a11d0379d733070ee52a.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848888763569143808 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohaffyza, Mimi Md Yunos, Jailani Yee, Mei Heong Junita, Junita Rizal, Fahmi Ibrahim, Badaruddin |
| author_facet | Mohaffyza, Mimi Md Yunos, Jailani Yee, Mei Heong Junita, Junita Rizal, Fahmi Ibrahim, Badaruddin |
| author_sort | Mohaffyza, Mimi |
| building | UTHM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Educators Ishould Ibe Iconsidered Ithe Ilearning Istyle Iof Istudents Iso Ithat Ithe Ibest Ipractice Iapproach Ican Ibe Iapplied Iin Ilearning Iactivities. IAs Istudents Iunderstand Itheir Ilearning Istyle, Ithey Iwill Ibe Iable Ito Iintegrate Iit Iinto Itheir Ilearning Iprocess. IKolb ILearning IStyle Iwas Ithe Ilearning Istyle Ithat Iwas Iwidely Iused Ibased Ion Ithe Itheory Iof Ilearning Iexperiences. ITherefore, Ithis Istudy Iaimed Ito Idescribe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents’ Ilearning Istyle. IThe Isurvey Iresearch Idesign Iwith Ia Iquantitative Iapproach Iwas Iapplied Iin Ithis Istudy. IA Itotal Iof I300 Irespondents Iwere Iselected Irandomly Ifrom Iall Ifaculties Iin IUniversiti ITun IHussein IOnn IMalaysia. IThe Isurvey Iquestionnaire Iconsisted Iof Itwo Imain Isections Irepresenting ILearning IGoals, ILearning IStyle, Iand ILearning IActivities. IThe Iresult Iexplains Ithat Iboth Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Idominant Ito Iadopt Ithe IAccommodator Ilearning Istyle, followed Iby Ithe IConverger Ilearning Istyle, and Ithen IAssimilator Ilearning Istyle and IDiverger Ilearning Istyle. I IIt Iis Iconcluded Ithat Ithe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Iincline Ito Ibe Ia Ikinesthetic Ilearner. IThese Ilearning Ipreferences Iand Ilearning Istyles Iwill Icontribute Ito Itheir Iengagement Iin Ithe Iconcept Iof Ilearning and for educators to plan teaching strategies. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T20:15:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | uthm-6273 |
| institution | Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T20:15:27Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | uthm-62732022-01-28T00:39:44Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/ Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students Mohaffyza, Mimi Md Yunos, Jailani Yee, Mei Heong Junita, Junita Rizal, Fahmi Ibrahim, Badaruddin L Education (General) Educators Ishould Ibe Iconsidered Ithe Ilearning Istyle Iof Istudents Iso Ithat Ithe Ibest Ipractice Iapproach Ican Ibe Iapplied Iin Ilearning Iactivities. IAs Istudents Iunderstand Itheir Ilearning Istyle, Ithey Iwill Ibe Iable Ito Iintegrate Iit Iinto Itheir Ilearning Iprocess. IKolb ILearning IStyle Iwas Ithe Ilearning Istyle Ithat Iwas Iwidely Iused Ibased Ion Ithe Itheory Iof Ilearning Iexperiences. ITherefore, Ithis Istudy Iaimed Ito Idescribe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents’ Ilearning Istyle. IThe Isurvey Iresearch Idesign Iwith Ia Iquantitative Iapproach Iwas Iapplied Iin Ithis Istudy. IA Itotal Iof I300 Irespondents Iwere Iselected Irandomly Ifrom Iall Ifaculties Iin IUniversiti ITun IHussein IOnn IMalaysia. IThe Isurvey Iquestionnaire Iconsisted Iof Itwo Imain Isections Irepresenting ILearning IGoals, ILearning IStyle, Iand ILearning IActivities. IThe Iresult Iexplains Ithat Iboth Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Idominant Ito Iadopt Ithe IAccommodator Ilearning Istyle, followed Iby Ithe IConverger Ilearning Istyle, and Ithen IAssimilator Ilearning Istyle and IDiverger Ilearning Istyle. I IIt Iis Iconcluded Ithat Ithe Iengineering Iand Inon-engineering Istudents Iare Imore Iincline Ito Ibe Ia Ikinesthetic Ilearner. IThese Ilearning Ipreferences Iand Ilearning Istyles Iwill Icontribute Ito Itheir Iengagement Iin Ithe Iconcept Iof Ilearning and for educators to plan teaching strategies. 2021 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/1/J12880_84c814756d82a11d0379d733070ee52a.pdf Mohaffyza, Mimi and Md Yunos, Jailani and Yee, Mei Heong and Junita, Junita and Rizal, Fahmi and Ibrahim, Badaruddin (2021) Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students. Advances Iin IScience, ITechnology Iand IEngineering ISystems IJournal, 6 (4). pp. 184-188. ISSN 2415-6698 https://dx.doi.org/10.25046/aj060422 |
| spellingShingle | L Education (General) Mohaffyza, Mimi Md Yunos, Jailani Yee, Mei Heong Junita, Junita Rizal, Fahmi Ibrahim, Badaruddin Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students |
| title | Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students |
| title_full | Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students |
| title_short | Comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students |
| title_sort | comparison of learning style for engineering and non-engineering students |
| topic | L Education (General) |
| url | http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/ http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/ http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/6273/1/J12880_84c814756d82a11d0379d733070ee52a.pdf |