Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?

Studies on various captology applications have indicated the importance of its integration to ensure mobile application=s success. However, statistics have shown that 53% of mobile applications users had problems with mobile applications and discontinue their use. This raises a question whether inco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah, N.A., Abdul Hamid, Nor Aziati, C., C. Siew, Shamsuddin, Alina, Wahab, Eta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medwell Publisers 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5886/
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5886/1/AJ%202018%20%28640%29.pdf
_version_ 1848888660996390912
author Abdullah, N.A.
Abdul Hamid, Nor Aziati
C., C. Siew
Shamsuddin, Alina
Wahab, Eta
author_facet Abdullah, N.A.
Abdul Hamid, Nor Aziati
C., C. Siew
Shamsuddin, Alina
Wahab, Eta
author_sort Abdullah, N.A.
building UTHM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Studies on various captology applications have indicated the importance of its integration to ensure mobile application=s success. However, statistics have shown that 53% of mobile applications users had problems with mobile applications and discontinue their use. This raises a question whether incorporating captology strategies has varying effectiveness. Moreover, the studies on captology strategies of mobile application have not been sufficiently researched on as majority of existing studies have been focusing on single application only. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether there are significant differences of captology principles (reduction, tunneling, tailoring, suggestion, self-monitoring, surveillance and conditioning) between two popular mobile applications which are WhatsApp and Telegram. Using a cross sectional online survey, 364 users of both applications had participated. Descriptive finding indicates that WhatsApp had higher mean values for all captology principles compared to Telegram. T-test result shows significant differences of reduction, tunneling, tailoring, suggestion, self-monitoring, surveillance and conditioning between WhatsApp and Telegram. The higher means obtained by WhatsApp indicated that users of WhatsApp perceive captology principles as being incorporated more effectively in WhatApp compared to Telegram. This implies that any incorporation of captology principles requires in-depth understanding about the dynamic of each principles and how it could improve mobile application=s users acceptance, attitudes and behavior.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T20:13:49Z
format Article
id uthm-5886
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T20:13:49Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Medwell Publisers
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling uthm-58862022-01-24T07:06:54Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5886/ Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ? Abdullah, N.A. Abdul Hamid, Nor Aziati C., C. Siew Shamsuddin, Alina Wahab, Eta T173.2-174.5 Technological change T175-178 Industrial research. Research and development Studies on various captology applications have indicated the importance of its integration to ensure mobile application=s success. However, statistics have shown that 53% of mobile applications users had problems with mobile applications and discontinue their use. This raises a question whether incorporating captology strategies has varying effectiveness. Moreover, the studies on captology strategies of mobile application have not been sufficiently researched on as majority of existing studies have been focusing on single application only. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether there are significant differences of captology principles (reduction, tunneling, tailoring, suggestion, self-monitoring, surveillance and conditioning) between two popular mobile applications which are WhatsApp and Telegram. Using a cross sectional online survey, 364 users of both applications had participated. Descriptive finding indicates that WhatsApp had higher mean values for all captology principles compared to Telegram. T-test result shows significant differences of reduction, tunneling, tailoring, suggestion, self-monitoring, surveillance and conditioning between WhatsApp and Telegram. The higher means obtained by WhatsApp indicated that users of WhatsApp perceive captology principles as being incorporated more effectively in WhatApp compared to Telegram. This implies that any incorporation of captology principles requires in-depth understanding about the dynamic of each principles and how it could improve mobile application=s users acceptance, attitudes and behavior. Medwell Publisers 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5886/1/AJ%202018%20%28640%29.pdf Abdullah, N.A. and Abdul Hamid, Nor Aziati and C., C. Siew and Shamsuddin, Alina and Wahab, Eta (2018) Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ? Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13 (9). pp. 7019-7025. ISSN 1818-7803 http://dx.doi.org/10.36478/jeasci.2018.7019.7025
spellingShingle T173.2-174.5 Technological change
T175-178 Industrial research. Research and development
Abdullah, N.A.
Abdul Hamid, Nor Aziati
C., C. Siew
Shamsuddin, Alina
Wahab, Eta
Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?
title Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?
title_full Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?
title_fullStr Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?
title_full_unstemmed Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?
title_short Perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?
title_sort perceived captology strategies in mobile applications: do they differ?
topic T173.2-174.5 Technological change
T175-178 Industrial research. Research and development
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5886/
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5886/
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5886/1/AJ%202018%20%28640%29.pdf