Policy available and sustainable waterfront development

Waterfront redevelopment emerged in the 1970s. Since then, numerous waterfront areas went through transitions from abandoned spaces to commercial, residential and recreational areas. The transformation symbolizes the independent city states’ efforts to remake themselves for the 21st century. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md. Yassin, Azlina, Nasid Masrom, Md Asrul, Mohd. Razali, Mohd. Najib, Mohd. Adnan, Yasmin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysia Insititute of Planner 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5832/
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5832/1/AJ%202018%20%28602%29.pdf
_version_ 1848888645356879872
author Md. Yassin, Azlina
Nasid Masrom, Md Asrul
Mohd. Razali, Mohd. Najib
Mohd. Adnan, Yasmin
author_facet Md. Yassin, Azlina
Nasid Masrom, Md Asrul
Mohd. Razali, Mohd. Najib
Mohd. Adnan, Yasmin
author_sort Md. Yassin, Azlina
building UTHM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Waterfront redevelopment emerged in the 1970s. Since then, numerous waterfront areas went through transitions from abandoned spaces to commercial, residential and recreational areas. The transformation symbolizes the independent city states’ efforts to remake themselves for the 21st century. However, due to constraints such as ineffective governance as well as inadequate federal, state and municipal planning guidelines, the waterfronts faced problems such as environmental degradation, crime and flooding. Although some waterfront development projects remained profitable due to good public access, many did not. This paper intends to identify and evaluate the current regulations and guidelines towards sustainable waterfront development in Malaysia. The findings were based on the questionnaires mailed and e-mailed to property development companies listed under Bursa Malaysia in Malaysia. The findings identified ten laws and regulations related to waterfront development in Malaysia such as; the National Land Code 1965, the Town and Country Planning Act 1976, and the Environment Quality Act 1974. In terms of the sufficiency of those regulations and guidelines for controlling waterfront development, more than half of respondents claimed that Malaysia did not have sufficient regulations to control waterfront development and the regulations were weakly enforced in Malaysia. The findings indicated that the government and the policy makers need to improve regulations for waterfront development.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T20:13:34Z
format Article
id uthm-5832
institution Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T20:13:34Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Malaysia Insititute of Planner
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling uthm-58322022-01-24T03:01:27Z http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5832/ Policy available and sustainable waterfront development Md. Yassin, Azlina Nasid Masrom, Md Asrul Mohd. Razali, Mohd. Najib Mohd. Adnan, Yasmin TE177-178.8 Roadside development. Landscaping Waterfront redevelopment emerged in the 1970s. Since then, numerous waterfront areas went through transitions from abandoned spaces to commercial, residential and recreational areas. The transformation symbolizes the independent city states’ efforts to remake themselves for the 21st century. However, due to constraints such as ineffective governance as well as inadequate federal, state and municipal planning guidelines, the waterfronts faced problems such as environmental degradation, crime and flooding. Although some waterfront development projects remained profitable due to good public access, many did not. This paper intends to identify and evaluate the current regulations and guidelines towards sustainable waterfront development in Malaysia. The findings were based on the questionnaires mailed and e-mailed to property development companies listed under Bursa Malaysia in Malaysia. The findings identified ten laws and regulations related to waterfront development in Malaysia such as; the National Land Code 1965, the Town and Country Planning Act 1976, and the Environment Quality Act 1974. In terms of the sufficiency of those regulations and guidelines for controlling waterfront development, more than half of respondents claimed that Malaysia did not have sufficient regulations to control waterfront development and the regulations were weakly enforced in Malaysia. The findings indicated that the government and the policy makers need to improve regulations for waterfront development. Malaysia Insititute of Planner 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5832/1/AJ%202018%20%28602%29.pdf Md. Yassin, Azlina and Nasid Masrom, Md Asrul and Mohd. Razali, Mohd. Najib and Mohd. Adnan, Yasmin (2018) Policy available and sustainable waterfront development. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 16 (1). pp. 397-404. ISSN 0128-0945 http://dx.doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i5.441
spellingShingle TE177-178.8 Roadside development. Landscaping
Md. Yassin, Azlina
Nasid Masrom, Md Asrul
Mohd. Razali, Mohd. Najib
Mohd. Adnan, Yasmin
Policy available and sustainable waterfront development
title Policy available and sustainable waterfront development
title_full Policy available and sustainable waterfront development
title_fullStr Policy available and sustainable waterfront development
title_full_unstemmed Policy available and sustainable waterfront development
title_short Policy available and sustainable waterfront development
title_sort policy available and sustainable waterfront development
topic TE177-178.8 Roadside development. Landscaping
url http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5832/
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5832/
http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/5832/1/AJ%202018%20%28602%29.pdf