Preliminary study: comparison of 2 different techniques in recurve archery
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of two different archery methods on the shooting performance. The participants are four male recurve archers from Kelantan who volunteered to join this study. Pre and post-test scores of the total points for 36 arrows shot at 10 meters and 30 met...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Monograph |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universiti Sains Malaysia
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/62618/ http://eprints.usm.my/62618/1/LAU%20JIUN%20SIEW%20-%20e.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848885051322793984 |
|---|---|
| author | Sien, Lau Jiun |
| author_facet | Sien, Lau Jiun |
| author_sort | Sien, Lau Jiun |
| building | USM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of two different archery methods on the
shooting performance. The participants are four male recurve archers from Kelantan who
volunteered to join this study. Pre and post-test scores of the total points for 36 arrows
shot at 10 meters and 30 meters were collected. 3D motion analysis (Qualysis) system
was used to record the method of the archers (stance, posture and shoulder alignment)
and it was measured simultaneously. After a familiarisation period to the body markers
and testing environment, the participants were asked to shoot 36 arrows with their method
at a distance 10m and 30m. Then, the participants were taught the BEST method and were
given one week to be familiar with the method. The scores were collected again at 10m
and 30m with the BEST method. The methods of recurve archery were further broken
down to 10 steps for analyses. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to detect the difference
between their own method and BEST method based on 3D motion analysis data. Most of
the participants showed significant changes in the shooting steps, 8 steps out of 10 steps
showed significant differences (p<0.05). This showed that the BEST method is different
from the participants’ method. The changes used in the method showed the improvement
in the shooting performance. Most of the participants showed improvement in the score
for 10 meter and 30 meter as well as the distance of the arrow away from the centre based
on the (p<0.05). Thus, from the result, it can be concluded that BEST method able to
improve the participant performance. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T19:16:27Z |
| format | Monograph |
| id | usm-62618 |
| institution | Universiti Sains Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T19:16:27Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Universiti Sains Malaysia |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | usm-626182025-07-23T06:14:09Z http://eprints.usm.my/62618/ Preliminary study: comparison of 2 different techniques in recurve archery Sien, Lau Jiun R Medicine (General) RA440-440.87 Study and teaching. Research The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of two different archery methods on the shooting performance. The participants are four male recurve archers from Kelantan who volunteered to join this study. Pre and post-test scores of the total points for 36 arrows shot at 10 meters and 30 meters were collected. 3D motion analysis (Qualysis) system was used to record the method of the archers (stance, posture and shoulder alignment) and it was measured simultaneously. After a familiarisation period to the body markers and testing environment, the participants were asked to shoot 36 arrows with their method at a distance 10m and 30m. Then, the participants were taught the BEST method and were given one week to be familiar with the method. The scores were collected again at 10m and 30m with the BEST method. The methods of recurve archery were further broken down to 10 steps for analyses. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to detect the difference between their own method and BEST method based on 3D motion analysis data. Most of the participants showed significant changes in the shooting steps, 8 steps out of 10 steps showed significant differences (p<0.05). This showed that the BEST method is different from the participants’ method. The changes used in the method showed the improvement in the shooting performance. Most of the participants showed improvement in the score for 10 meter and 30 meter as well as the distance of the arrow away from the centre based on the (p<0.05). Thus, from the result, it can be concluded that BEST method able to improve the participant performance. Universiti Sains Malaysia 2016 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/62618/1/LAU%20JIUN%20SIEW%20-%20e.pdf Sien, Lau Jiun (2016) Preliminary study: comparison of 2 different techniques in recurve archery. Project Report. Universiti Sains Malaysia. (Submitted) |
| spellingShingle | R Medicine (General) RA440-440.87 Study and teaching. Research Sien, Lau Jiun Preliminary study: comparison of 2 different techniques in recurve archery |
| title | Preliminary study:
comparison of 2 different techniques in
recurve archery |
| title_full | Preliminary study:
comparison of 2 different techniques in
recurve archery |
| title_fullStr | Preliminary study:
comparison of 2 different techniques in
recurve archery |
| title_full_unstemmed | Preliminary study:
comparison of 2 different techniques in
recurve archery |
| title_short | Preliminary study:
comparison of 2 different techniques in
recurve archery |
| title_sort | preliminary study:
comparison of 2 different techniques in
recurve archery |
| topic | R Medicine (General) RA440-440.87 Study and teaching. Research |
| url | http://eprints.usm.my/62618/ http://eprints.usm.my/62618/1/LAU%20JIUN%20SIEW%20-%20e.pdf |