Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study

Introduction: Wound disruption is a known complication of caesarean section, which may cause additional and unnecessary morbidity to the patients. Its occurrence is influenced by many factors, of which technique of operation is one of the contributing factors. This study was carried out in order...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dass, Anil G. Krishna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/46009/
http://eprints.usm.my/46009/1/GP...Subcutaneous%20Stitch%20losure%20Versus%20Non-Closure%20o%20Prevent%20Wound%20Disruption%20After%20Caesarean%20Section...2007...-24%20pages.pdf
_version_ 1848880487316062208
author Dass, Anil G. Krishna
author_facet Dass, Anil G. Krishna
author_sort Dass, Anil G. Krishna
building USM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Introduction: Wound disruption is a known complication of caesarean section, which may cause additional and unnecessary morbidity to the patients. Its occurrence is influenced by many factors, of which technique of operation is one of the contributing factors. This study was carried out in order to determine whether closure of subcutaneous fat layer measuring 2cm or more will reduce the incidence of post caesarean wound disruption. Methods: Patients whose subcutaneous fat thickness of 2cm or more, underwent caesarean section were randomised into closure group and non- closure group. In the closure group, the subcutaneous fat layer was stitched while those in the ~on- closure group was not stitched. The result of wound healing was observed en the third, tenth and 42"d post- caesarean. Result: 120 patients were recruited into the study, with 60 samples were available for each group. There was 1. 7 percent of wound disruption occurred on the third day of caesarean section for each arm. Ten percent of wound disruption was noted to occur on the tenth day in the closure group as compared to 35 percent for the non .. closure group (p value 0.001 ). No wound disruption was noted on the 42"d day post caesarean section for closure group, while 3.3 percent was noted for the non- closure group, but not statistically significant. Conclusion: Closing the subcutaneous fat tissue measuring 2cm and above for patients undergoing caesarean section may help to reduce the occurrence of wound disruption post caesarean section.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T18:03:54Z
format Article
id usm-46009
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T18:03:54Z
publishDate 2005
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling usm-460092020-01-28T07:32:07Z http://eprints.usm.my/46009/ Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study Dass, Anil G. Krishna RG Gynecology and obstetrics Introduction: Wound disruption is a known complication of caesarean section, which may cause additional and unnecessary morbidity to the patients. Its occurrence is influenced by many factors, of which technique of operation is one of the contributing factors. This study was carried out in order to determine whether closure of subcutaneous fat layer measuring 2cm or more will reduce the incidence of post caesarean wound disruption. Methods: Patients whose subcutaneous fat thickness of 2cm or more, underwent caesarean section were randomised into closure group and non- closure group. In the closure group, the subcutaneous fat layer was stitched while those in the ~on- closure group was not stitched. The result of wound healing was observed en the third, tenth and 42"d post- caesarean. Result: 120 patients were recruited into the study, with 60 samples were available for each group. There was 1. 7 percent of wound disruption occurred on the third day of caesarean section for each arm. Ten percent of wound disruption was noted to occur on the tenth day in the closure group as compared to 35 percent for the non .. closure group (p value 0.001 ). No wound disruption was noted on the 42"d day post caesarean section for closure group, while 3.3 percent was noted for the non- closure group, but not statistically significant. Conclusion: Closing the subcutaneous fat tissue measuring 2cm and above for patients undergoing caesarean section may help to reduce the occurrence of wound disruption post caesarean section. 2005 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/46009/1/GP...Subcutaneous%20Stitch%20losure%20Versus%20Non-Closure%20o%20Prevent%20Wound%20Disruption%20After%20Caesarean%20Section...2007...-24%20pages.pdf Dass, Anil G. Krishna (2005) Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study. Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study. (Submitted)
spellingShingle RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Dass, Anil G. Krishna
Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study
title Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study
title_full Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study
title_fullStr Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study
title_short Closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study
title_sort closure versus non closure of the subcutaneous fat layer of 2cm and more to prevent the incidence of wound disruption: an observational study
topic RG Gynecology and obstetrics
url http://eprints.usm.my/46009/
http://eprints.usm.my/46009/1/GP...Subcutaneous%20Stitch%20losure%20Versus%20Non-Closure%20o%20Prevent%20Wound%20Disruption%20After%20Caesarean%20Section...2007...-24%20pages.pdf