Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery

Background: Kataria and Paedfusor are two validated target controlled infusion (TCI) models for propofol in paediatric population. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two different TCI models for propofol in paediatric age group during elective surgery. Methods: 38 pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mansor, Azelia
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/44543/
http://eprints.usm.my/44543/1/Dr.%20Azelia%20Manso-24%20pages.pdf
_version_ 1848880089268224000
author Mansor, Azelia
author_facet Mansor, Azelia
author_sort Mansor, Azelia
building USM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Kataria and Paedfusor are two validated target controlled infusion (TCI) models for propofol in paediatric population. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two different TCI models for propofol in paediatric age group during elective surgery. Methods: 38 patients, aged 3-12 year-old, classified under ASA I and II, who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia, were randomised into two groups; Group Kataria (n=19) and Group Paedfusor (n=19). All patients received 1 mcg/kg loading dose of intravenous (IV) remifentanil over 1 minute 15 seconds and followed with infusion at 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg/min. Then, both groups were induced at plasma concentration (Cpt) propofol of 6 mcg/ml using respective model and maintained with Cpt between 3 to 6 mcg/ml guided by bispectral index (BIS) between 40-60. Remifentanil was maintained between 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg/min. Success rate of induction, induction time, recovery time and plasma concentration (Cp) at recovery were recorded for statistical analysis.Results: Both groups were successfully induced with propofol Cpt of 6mcg/ml. There were no significant difference in induction and recovery time between these two groups. The plasma concentration at recovery in Kataria group was significantly lower than Paedfusor group [1.48 (0.11) mcg/ml vs 1.59 (0.14) mcg/ml, p=0.01]. Conclusion: TCI propofol for paediatric patients using Kataria and Paedfusor models were equally effective in success rate of induction, induction time and recovery time. Only plasma concentration at recovery was lower in Kataria group.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T17:57:35Z
format Thesis
id usm-44543
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T17:57:35Z
publishDate 2017
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling usm-445432020-10-22T03:03:14Z http://eprints.usm.my/44543/ Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery Mansor, Azelia RD Surgery Background: Kataria and Paedfusor are two validated target controlled infusion (TCI) models for propofol in paediatric population. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two different TCI models for propofol in paediatric age group during elective surgery. Methods: 38 patients, aged 3-12 year-old, classified under ASA I and II, who underwent elective surgery under general anaesthesia, were randomised into two groups; Group Kataria (n=19) and Group Paedfusor (n=19). All patients received 1 mcg/kg loading dose of intravenous (IV) remifentanil over 1 minute 15 seconds and followed with infusion at 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg/min. Then, both groups were induced at plasma concentration (Cpt) propofol of 6 mcg/ml using respective model and maintained with Cpt between 3 to 6 mcg/ml guided by bispectral index (BIS) between 40-60. Remifentanil was maintained between 0.1 to 1 mcg/kg/min. Success rate of induction, induction time, recovery time and plasma concentration (Cp) at recovery were recorded for statistical analysis.Results: Both groups were successfully induced with propofol Cpt of 6mcg/ml. There were no significant difference in induction and recovery time between these two groups. The plasma concentration at recovery in Kataria group was significantly lower than Paedfusor group [1.48 (0.11) mcg/ml vs 1.59 (0.14) mcg/ml, p=0.01]. Conclusion: TCI propofol for paediatric patients using Kataria and Paedfusor models were equally effective in success rate of induction, induction time and recovery time. Only plasma concentration at recovery was lower in Kataria group. 2017 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/44543/1/Dr.%20Azelia%20Manso-24%20pages.pdf Mansor, Azelia (2017) Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery. Masters thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
spellingShingle RD Surgery
Mansor, Azelia
Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery
title Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery
title_full Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery
title_short Comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (TCI) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness between kataria and paedfusor models of target controlled infusion (tci) during anaesthesia in elective paediatric surgery
topic RD Surgery
url http://eprints.usm.my/44543/
http://eprints.usm.my/44543/1/Dr.%20Azelia%20Manso-24%20pages.pdf