Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions

Research in meta-discourse, particularly explicit meta-discourse or meta-discourse markers has contributed much knowledge on the discourse features of specialised genres. However, there are very few studies on implicit meta-discourse. The current study explores implicit meta-discourse in legal di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He, Mengyu, Rahim, Hajar Abdul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/39078/
http://eprints.usm.my/39078/1/EXPLORING_IMPLICIT_META-DISCOURSE_IN_LEGAL_DISCOURSE_AN_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_CHINESE_AND_AMERICAN_CONSTITUTIONS.pdf
_version_ 1848878645934817280
author He, Mengyu
Rahim, Hajar Abdul
author_facet He, Mengyu
Rahim, Hajar Abdul
author_sort He, Mengyu
building USM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Research in meta-discourse, particularly explicit meta-discourse or meta-discourse markers has contributed much knowledge on the discourse features of specialised genres. However, there are very few studies on implicit meta-discourse. The current study explores implicit meta-discourse in legal discourse by comparing the implicit interpersonal meta-discourse in the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China with the Constitution of the United States. The focus of the study is the use of implicit meta-discourse, particularly the grammatical meta-discourse in the legal discourse of two different languages and cultural groups. The findings demonstrate that there are similarities and differences in the use of implicit meta-discourse in the two constitutions. Within the context of language discourse, the findings of the current study suggest that legal discourse is distinctive in the use of implicit interpersonal meta-discourse, particularly in the way writers intrude into the discourse implicitly by certain key grammatical forms of meta-discourse. Despite the objectivity and rigour of legal discourse, the current study found that there is some level of subjectivity in such discourse, evident from the use of implicit meta-discourse.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T17:34:38Z
format Article
id usm-39078
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T17:34:38Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling usm-390782018-02-21T06:26:26Z http://eprints.usm.my/39078/ Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions He, Mengyu Rahim, Hajar Abdul P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General) Research in meta-discourse, particularly explicit meta-discourse or meta-discourse markers has contributed much knowledge on the discourse features of specialised genres. However, there are very few studies on implicit meta-discourse. The current study explores implicit meta-discourse in legal discourse by comparing the implicit interpersonal meta-discourse in the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China with the Constitution of the United States. The focus of the study is the use of implicit meta-discourse, particularly the grammatical meta-discourse in the legal discourse of two different languages and cultural groups. The findings demonstrate that there are similarities and differences in the use of implicit meta-discourse in the two constitutions. Within the context of language discourse, the findings of the current study suggest that legal discourse is distinctive in the use of implicit interpersonal meta-discourse, particularly in the way writers intrude into the discourse implicitly by certain key grammatical forms of meta-discourse. Despite the objectivity and rigour of legal discourse, the current study found that there is some level of subjectivity in such discourse, evident from the use of implicit meta-discourse. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 2017-09 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/39078/1/EXPLORING_IMPLICIT_META-DISCOURSE_IN_LEGAL_DISCOURSE_AN_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_CHINESE_AND_AMERICAN_CONSTITUTIONS.pdf He, Mengyu and Rahim, Hajar Abdul (2017) Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (2). pp. 391-403. ISSN 2301-9468 http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8138
spellingShingle P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General)
He, Mengyu
Rahim, Hajar Abdul
Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions
title Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions
title_full Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions
title_fullStr Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions
title_short Exploring Implicit Meta-Discourse In Legal Discourse: An Analysis Of The Chinese And American Constitutions
title_sort exploring implicit meta-discourse in legal discourse: an analysis of the chinese and american constitutions
topic P1-1091 Philology. Linguistics(General)
url http://eprints.usm.my/39078/
http://eprints.usm.my/39078/
http://eprints.usm.my/39078/1/EXPLORING_IMPLICIT_META-DISCOURSE_IN_LEGAL_DISCOURSE_AN_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_CHINESE_AND_AMERICAN_CONSTITUTIONS.pdf