MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue?
A dialogue is commonly understood to involve more than one party engaging with each other, especially to exchange ideas and come to an understanding and agreement on certain issues. That would include an agreement to disagree in a civil way. The more intense the issue, the more relevant the need f...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/32928/ http://eprints.usm.my/32928/1/DZUL210.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848876940839092224 |
|---|---|
| author | Abd Razak, Dzulkifli |
| author_facet | Abd Razak, Dzulkifli |
| author_sort | Abd Razak, Dzulkifli |
| building | USM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | A dialogue is commonly understood to involve more than one party engaging with each other, especially to
exchange ideas and come to an understanding and agreement on certain issues. That would include an
agreement to disagree in a civil way. The more intense the issue, the more relevant the need for a dialogue.
Indeed many conflicting parties usually resolve their differences through a dialogue. The prerequisite? There
must be sincerity, trust and respect for mutual benefits and interest — more so when it involves a good
majority of the community. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T17:07:32Z |
| format | Article |
| id | usm-32928 |
| institution | Universiti Sains Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T17:07:32Z |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | usm-329282017-04-07T01:28:24Z http://eprints.usm.my/32928/ MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? Abd Razak, Dzulkifli DS591-599 Malaysia. Malay Peninsula. Straits Settlements A dialogue is commonly understood to involve more than one party engaging with each other, especially to exchange ideas and come to an understanding and agreement on certain issues. That would include an agreement to disagree in a civil way. The more intense the issue, the more relevant the need for a dialogue. Indeed many conflicting parties usually resolve their differences through a dialogue. The prerequisite? There must be sincerity, trust and respect for mutual benefits and interest — more so when it involves a good majority of the community. 2008-08-25 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/32928/1/DZUL210.pdf Abd Razak, Dzulkifli (2008) MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? The Edge. |
| spellingShingle | DS591-599 Malaysia. Malay Peninsula. Straits Settlements Abd Razak, Dzulkifli MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? |
| title | MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? |
| title_full | MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? |
| title_fullStr | MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? |
| title_full_unstemmed | MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? |
| title_short | MY SAY: To dialogue or not to dialogue? |
| title_sort | my say: to dialogue or not to dialogue? |
| topic | DS591-599 Malaysia. Malay Peninsula. Straits Settlements |
| url | http://eprints.usm.my/32928/ http://eprints.usm.my/32928/1/DZUL210.pdf |