Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers

Debate is a language learning activity that requires the debater to choose effective oral communication strategies to weaken the opponent. Thus, this study was conducted to identify the oral communication strategies preferences among Arabic language debaters consisting of non-native speakers. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi, Mustapha, Nik Farhan, Mohamad, Ab Halim, Shamshudeen, Rosya Izyanie, Mohmad Rouyan, Nurazan
Format: Article
Published: HRMARS 2021
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/94472/
_version_ 1848862007273455616
author Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi
Mustapha, Nik Farhan
Mohamad, Ab Halim
Shamshudeen, Rosya Izyanie
Mohmad Rouyan, Nurazan
author_facet Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi
Mustapha, Nik Farhan
Mohamad, Ab Halim
Shamshudeen, Rosya Izyanie
Mohmad Rouyan, Nurazan
author_sort Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Debate is a language learning activity that requires the debater to choose effective oral communication strategies to weaken the opponent. Thus, this study was conducted to identify the oral communication strategies preferences among Arabic language debaters consisting of non-native speakers. The respondents were the champions of the Higher Education Institutions level debate, while the data were obtained from video recordings of the debate competition and interviews. The data were then analysed using Communication Strategies Theory. The results showed that the debaters preferred the strategies of message abandonment, topic avoidance and appeal for assistance when short of time and approximation and word coinage when faced with language constraints. Literal and contextual translation and language switch strategies were chosen for debate preparations, while circumlocution and mime strategies were preferred for reinforcing arguments. A new strategy was also found, which is named as repetition strategy. The findings proved that the preference of these strategies help the debaters to organize ideas, articulate and confidently present arguments despite their own shortcomings and interruptions from opponents. This study contributes to the structure of debate training activities focused on more systematic oral communication strategies that can be applied to debaters in Arabic language learning classes.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T13:10:10Z
format Article
id upm-94472
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-15T13:10:10Z
publishDate 2021
publisher HRMARS
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-944722023-02-07T03:58:35Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/94472/ Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi Mustapha, Nik Farhan Mohamad, Ab Halim Shamshudeen, Rosya Izyanie Mohmad Rouyan, Nurazan Debate is a language learning activity that requires the debater to choose effective oral communication strategies to weaken the opponent. Thus, this study was conducted to identify the oral communication strategies preferences among Arabic language debaters consisting of non-native speakers. The respondents were the champions of the Higher Education Institutions level debate, while the data were obtained from video recordings of the debate competition and interviews. The data were then analysed using Communication Strategies Theory. The results showed that the debaters preferred the strategies of message abandonment, topic avoidance and appeal for assistance when short of time and approximation and word coinage when faced with language constraints. Literal and contextual translation and language switch strategies were chosen for debate preparations, while circumlocution and mime strategies were preferred for reinforcing arguments. A new strategy was also found, which is named as repetition strategy. The findings proved that the preference of these strategies help the debaters to organize ideas, articulate and confidently present arguments despite their own shortcomings and interruptions from opponents. This study contributes to the structure of debate training activities focused on more systematic oral communication strategies that can be applied to debaters in Arabic language learning classes. HRMARS 2021-09-07 Article PeerReviewed Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi and Mustapha, Nik Farhan and Mohamad, Ab Halim and Shamshudeen, Rosya Izyanie and Mohmad Rouyan, Nurazan (2021) Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11 (9). 131 - 151. ISSN 2222-6990 https://hrmars.com/index.php/IJARBSS/article/view/10758/Oral-Communication-Strategies-Preferences-in-Arabic-Debate-among-Non-Arabic-Speakers 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i9/10758
spellingShingle Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi
Mustapha, Nik Farhan
Mohamad, Ab Halim
Shamshudeen, Rosya Izyanie
Mohmad Rouyan, Nurazan
Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers
title Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers
title_full Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers
title_fullStr Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers
title_full_unstemmed Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers
title_short Oral communication strategies preferences in Arabic debate among non-Arabic speakers
title_sort oral communication strategies preferences in arabic debate among non-arabic speakers
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/94472/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/94472/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/94472/