Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students

The purpose of this study was to identify differences in the scores of students' gross motor development from different school locations. This study was an ex post facto study involving 69 respondents. The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) instrument was utilized to obtain raw data. 12 s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdullah, Borhannudin, Mustakim, Siti Salina, Airak, Suphasara Supranie, Wen, Ang Xiao, Sheng, Hon Jia, Arpa, Arni Nurfatin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hampstead Psychological Associates 2020
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/1/Measuring%20gross%20motor%20development%20.pdf
_version_ 1848860263791460352
author Abdullah, Borhannudin
Mustakim, Siti Salina
Airak, Suphasara Supranie
Wen, Ang Xiao
Sheng, Hon Jia
Arpa, Arni Nurfatin
author_facet Abdullah, Borhannudin
Mustakim, Siti Salina
Airak, Suphasara Supranie
Wen, Ang Xiao
Sheng, Hon Jia
Arpa, Arni Nurfatin
author_sort Abdullah, Borhannudin
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The purpose of this study was to identify differences in the scores of students' gross motor development from different school locations. This study was an ex post facto study involving 69 respondents. The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) instrument was utilized to obtain raw data. 12 skills (locomotor: 6, manipulative: 6) were analyzed based on the performance criterion to obtain the raw scores of the study. The raw scores obtained were transcribed to obtain Locomotor Standard Scores (LSS), Manipulative Standard Scores (MSS), and Gross Motor Development Quotient (GMDQ) scores. The scores were analyzed descriptively to obtain the mean and standard deviation of the variables. ANOVA analysis was performed to compare the mean scores on the development of students' gross motor skills according to different school locations. Descriptive analysis showed that students in rural school (MM = 98.4348, SD = 10.268) had the highest mean for GMDQ compared with urban school (M = 76.5217, SD = 11.102) and indigenous school students (M = 85,000, SD = 5.427). Pupils in urban schools get the lowest scores in the developmental stages of motorcycle abuse. There was a significant difference F (18, 50) = 1.790, p = 0.05 for GMDQ scores between urban, rural, and indigenous schools. Post hoc analysis using Games-Howell was performed to see more clearly the differences between groups. The mean difference in mean scores occurred between rural and urban schools with a mean value of 21,913 and a mean difference value of p = .001 was similar to the difference between rural and indigenous schools with a mean of 13.434 and a mean difference value of p = .001. Whereas, the mean difference between urban schools and indigenous schools was low with mean value of 8.478 and significant difference p = .007. Findings indicated that there is a significant increase in motor development for each student according to the location of the school, but their development is not consistent with chronological age. The GMDQ score shows that the gross motor development of all students in different schools is still below average.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T12:42:28Z
format Article
id upm-86691
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T12:42:28Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Hampstead Psychological Associates
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-866912021-11-05T02:58:59Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/ Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students Abdullah, Borhannudin Mustakim, Siti Salina Airak, Suphasara Supranie Wen, Ang Xiao Sheng, Hon Jia Arpa, Arni Nurfatin The purpose of this study was to identify differences in the scores of students' gross motor development from different school locations. This study was an ex post facto study involving 69 respondents. The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) instrument was utilized to obtain raw data. 12 skills (locomotor: 6, manipulative: 6) were analyzed based on the performance criterion to obtain the raw scores of the study. The raw scores obtained were transcribed to obtain Locomotor Standard Scores (LSS), Manipulative Standard Scores (MSS), and Gross Motor Development Quotient (GMDQ) scores. The scores were analyzed descriptively to obtain the mean and standard deviation of the variables. ANOVA analysis was performed to compare the mean scores on the development of students' gross motor skills according to different school locations. Descriptive analysis showed that students in rural school (MM = 98.4348, SD = 10.268) had the highest mean for GMDQ compared with urban school (M = 76.5217, SD = 11.102) and indigenous school students (M = 85,000, SD = 5.427). Pupils in urban schools get the lowest scores in the developmental stages of motorcycle abuse. There was a significant difference F (18, 50) = 1.790, p = 0.05 for GMDQ scores between urban, rural, and indigenous schools. Post hoc analysis using Games-Howell was performed to see more clearly the differences between groups. The mean difference in mean scores occurred between rural and urban schools with a mean value of 21,913 and a mean difference value of p = .001 was similar to the difference between rural and indigenous schools with a mean of 13.434 and a mean difference value of p = .001. Whereas, the mean difference between urban schools and indigenous schools was low with mean value of 8.478 and significant difference p = .007. Findings indicated that there is a significant increase in motor development for each student according to the location of the school, but their development is not consistent with chronological age. The GMDQ score shows that the gross motor development of all students in different schools is still below average. Hampstead Psychological Associates 2020-05 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/1/Measuring%20gross%20motor%20development%20.pdf Abdullah, Borhannudin and Mustakim, Siti Salina and Airak, Suphasara Supranie and Wen, Ang Xiao and Sheng, Hon Jia and Arpa, Arni Nurfatin (2020) Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (8). 8736 - 8734. ISSN 1475-7192 https://www.psychosocial.com/article/PR280869/25161/ 10.37200/IJPR/V24I8/PR280869
spellingShingle Abdullah, Borhannudin
Mustakim, Siti Salina
Airak, Suphasara Supranie
Wen, Ang Xiao
Sheng, Hon Jia
Arpa, Arni Nurfatin
Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students
title Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students
title_full Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students
title_fullStr Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students
title_full_unstemmed Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students
title_short Measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students
title_sort measuring gross motor development quotient scores among rural, urban, and indigenous elementary schools’ students
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/86691/1/Measuring%20gross%20motor%20development%20.pdf