Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actua...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2011
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/1/Comparison%20between%20GVF%20snake%20and%20ED%20snake%20in%20segmenting%20microcalcifications.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848856316189081600 |
|---|---|
| author | Yasiran, Siti Salmah Jumaat, Abdul Kadir Manaf, Mazani Ibrahim, Arsmah Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina Abdul Malek, Aminah Laham, Mohamed Faris Mahmud, Rozi |
| author_facet | Yasiran, Siti Salmah Jumaat, Abdul Kadir Manaf, Mazani Ibrahim, Arsmah Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina Abdul Malek, Aminah Laham, Mohamed Faris Mahmud, Rozi |
| author_sort | Yasiran, Siti Salmah |
| building | UPM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T11:39:43Z |
| format | Conference or Workshop Item |
| id | upm-69113 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T11:39:43Z |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publisher | IEEE |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | upm-691132019-06-12T07:34:57Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/ Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications Yasiran, Siti Salmah Jumaat, Abdul Kadir Manaf, Mazani Ibrahim, Arsmah Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina Abdul Malek, Aminah Laham, Mohamed Faris Mahmud, Rozi Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%. IEEE 2011 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/1/Comparison%20between%20GVF%20snake%20and%20ED%20snake%20in%20segmenting%20microcalcifications.pdf Yasiran, Siti Salmah and Jumaat, Abdul Kadir and Manaf, Mazani and Ibrahim, Arsmah and Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina and Abdul Malek, Aminah and Laham, Mohamed Faris and Mahmud, Rozi (2011) Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications. In: 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE 2011), 4-7 Dec. 2011, Penang, Malaysia. (pp. 597-601). 10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162204 |
| spellingShingle | Yasiran, Siti Salmah Jumaat, Abdul Kadir Manaf, Mazani Ibrahim, Arsmah Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina Abdul Malek, Aminah Laham, Mohamed Faris Mahmud, Rozi Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications |
| title | Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications |
| title_full | Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications |
| title_short | Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications |
| title_sort | comparison between gvf snake and ed snake in segmenting microcalcifications |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/1/Comparison%20between%20GVF%20snake%20and%20ED%20snake%20in%20segmenting%20microcalcifications.pdf |